Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23007469›Full record

ReviewSeminars in immunopathology2013

Protumor and antitumor functions of neutrophil granulocytes.

Sven Brandau, Claudia A Dumitru, Stephan Lang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in immunopathology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Innate Immune Mechanisms in Normal and Adverse Pregnancy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Growth kinetics and predictive factors in renal angiomyolipomas.International urology and nephrology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neutrophils and Anesthetic Drugs: Implications in Onco-Anesthesia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sven BrandauDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122 Essen, Germany. sven.brandau@uk-essen.de
Claudia A Dumitru
Stephan Lang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutrophils are primary inflammatory cells and absolutely essential to protect the host during the early phases of microbial infection. Their role in cancer is less clear. Current evidence suggests that neutrophils show high functional plasticity and can adopt protumor and antitumor activity. Protumor neutrophils are functionally related to the recently described granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells. We propose a model in which homeostatic chronic recruitment and activation of neutrophils result in mainly protumor activity. In contrast, therapeutic interventions in many cases elicit acute activation, enhance direct effector functions as well as indirect regulatory functions of neutrophils with potent antitumor activity. Conversion of protumor activity of neutrophils into antitumor activity by means of appropriate stimulation or modulation may offer new possibilities in biologic therapy of cancer.

Indexed as

Models, ImmunologicalAnimalsHomeostasisHumansNeoplasmsNeutrophils

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.