ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2013
A model for peer experiential and reciprocal supervision (PEERS) for genetic counselors: development and preliminary evaluation within clinical practice.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applying and assessing the PEERS model on genetic counseling training in China: A mixed-method approach.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Enablers and barriers to effective clinical supervision in the workplace: a rapid evidence review.BMJ open · 2021Review
- Training Genetic Counsellors to Deliver an Innovative Therapeutic Intervention: their Views and Experience of Facilitating Multi-Family Discussion Groups.Journal of genetic counseling · 2017Article
- Effects of Anxiety on Novice Genetic Counseling Students' Experience of Supervised Clinical Rotations.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Article
- Genetic Counseling Supervisors' Self-Efficacy for Select Clinical Supervision Competencies.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Article
- Form Follows Function: A Model for Clinical Supervision of Genetic Counseling Students.Journal of genetic counseling · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A model for practising genetic counselors to obtain clinical supervision via reciprocal peer observation and feedback was developed and trialled. The model was developed in response to a perceived lack of opportunity for immediate observational feedback for practising genetic counselors. The aims reached by consensus were to facilitate learning new approaches and skills, to revitalise current ways of practising, and to enhance supervision skills in a two-way process, where the observer learnt from the counselor, and vice-versa. The genetic counselors agreed on a process of paired reciprocal observation whereby the observer was present in the room during the counseling session, and a reflective feedback discussion was arranged within 24 h of the session. Four main themes emerged from analysis of the recorded discussions were (i) "I wasn't sure if I-": voicing of doubts or internal questions that occurred during session for the counselor conducting the session, (ii) "I really liked that": positive feedback and validation from the observer, (iii) "I wonder whether-": offering of alternative views, insights and strategies by the observer, and (iv) "That's a real thing for me to take away and think about": evidence of learning by both observers and counselors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.