ArticleIsrael journal of health policy research2012
Quality of online health information about oral contraceptives from Hebrew-language websites.
Article in Israel journal of health policy research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the Accuracy, Credibility, and Readability of Statin-Related Websites: Cross-Sectional Study.Interactive journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Direct and Indirect Associations of Media Use With COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in South Korea: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Assessing the Quality of Online Health Information About Breast Cancer from Chinese Language Websites: Quality Assessment Survey.JMIR cancer · 2021Article
- Social Media Engagement and Influenza Vaccination During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Article
- Evaluating the Quality of Health-Related WeChat Public Accounts: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
- Quality of websites about long-acting reversible contraception: a descriptive cross-sectional study.Reproductive health · 2019Article
- Updates and reflections about the IJHPR, on the eve of its seventh year.Israel journal of health policy research · 2017Article
- Rare Diseases on the Internet: An Assessment of the Quality of Online Information.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Article
- Zika pandemic online trends, incidence and health risk communication: a time trend study.BMJ global health · 2017Article
- Adopting Quality Criteria for Websites Providing Medical Information About Rare Diseases.Interactive journal of medical research · 2016Article
- Making Quality Health Websites a National Public Health Priority: Toward Quality Standards.Journal of medical Internet research · 2016Article
- Reliability, Readability and Quality of Online Information about Femoracetabular Impingement.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2015Article
- Quality of websites of obstetrics and gynecology departments: a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2015Article
- Paediatric nurses' perception of the child-family dyad's autonomy in managing a chronic disease situation: the experience of an Italian paediatric department.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2013Article
- The internet, teenagers, and sexual health information: a cautionary tale.Israel journal of health policy research · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Internet is a frequently used source of health information. Adolescents in particular seem to be receptive to online health information (OHI) and often incorporate such information in their decision-making processes. Yet, OHI is often incomplete, inaccurate, or unreliable. This study assessed the quality of Hebrew online (non-user-generated) content on oral contraceptives (OC), with regard to accuracy/completeness, credibility, and usability.
methodsTwenty-nine websites in Hebrew, including those of the four Israeli HMOs, were identified and evaluated. The websites were categorized as: HMO, health portal, contraception-specific, promotional-commercial, and life style and women's health. A set of established content parameters was selected by a family planning expert to assess accuracy/completeness. The Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HONcode) principles were used to assess the websites' reliability. Usability was assessed by applying items selected from the Minervation Validation and the University of Michigan's 'Website Evaluation checklist' scale. Mean scores, standard deviations (SD), and ranges were calculated for all websites and for category-specific websites. Correlation between dimensions and Inter-rater reliability were also examined.
resultsThe mean score for accuracy/completeness was 50.9% for all websites (SD=30.1%, range 8-100%). Many websites failed to provide complete information, or provided inaccurate information regarding what to do when a pill is missed and when to use back-up methods. The average credibility score for all websites was 70.6% (SD=15.1, range=38=98%). The credibility parameters that were most commonly absent were funding source, authoring, date of content creation and last modification, explicit reference to evidence-based information, and references and citations. The average usability score for all websites was 94.5% (SD=6.9%, range 79-100%). A weak correlation was found between the three quality parameters assessed.
conclusionsWide variation was noted in the quality of Hebrew-language OC websites. HMOs' websites scored highest on credibility and usability, and contraceptive-specific websites exhibited the greatest accuracy/completeness. The findings highlight the need to establish quality guidelines for health website content, train health care providers in assisting their patients to seek high quality OHI, and strengthen e-health literacy skills among online-information seekers, including perhaps health professionals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.