Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23006041›Full record

ArticleJournal of medicinal chemistry2012

Design, synthesis, and structure-activity relationships of highly potent 5-HT₃ receptor ligands.

Mark H P Verheij, Andrew J Thompson, Jacqueline E van Muijlwijk-Koezen, Sarah C R Lummis, Rob Leurs, Iwan J P de Esch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. 5-HTCurrent neuropharmacology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Structure-Guided Design ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Discriminating between 5-HT₃A and 5-HT₃AB receptors.British journal of pharmacology · 2013
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark H P VerheijLeiden/Amsterdam Center of Drug Research-LACDR, Amsterdam Institute for Molecules Medicines and Systems-AIMMS, Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Andrew J Thompson
Jacqueline E van Muijlwijk-Koezen
Sarah C R Lummis
Rob Leurs
Iwan J P de Esch

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 081925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 5-HT₃ receptor, a pentameric ligand-gated ion channel (pLGIC), is an important therapeutic target. During a recent fragment screen, 6-chloro-N-methyl-2-(4-methyl-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)quinazolin-4-amine (1) was identified as a 5-HT₃ hit fragment. Here we describe the synthesis and structure-activity relationships (SAR) of a series of (iso)quinoline and quinazoline compounds that were synthesized and screened for 5-HT₃ R affinity using a [³H]granisetron displacement assay. These studies resulted in the discovery of several high affinity ligands of which compound 22 showed the highest affinity (pK(i) > 10) for the 5-HT₃ receptor. The observed SAR is in agreement with established pharmacophore models for 5-HT₃ ligands and is used for ligand-receptor binding mode prediction using homology modeling and in silico docking approaches.

Indexed as

Binding, CompetitiveComputer SimulationDrug DesignHEK293 CellsHumansIsoquinolinesLigandsModels, MolecularQuinazolinesQuinolinesRadioligand AssayReceptors, Serotonin, 5-HT3StereoisomerismStructure-Activity RelationshipIsoquinolinesLigandsQuinazolinesQuinolinesReceptors, Serotonin, 5-HT3

Identifiers

PMID23006041
PMCPMC3504484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.