Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23002433›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2013

The role and status of evidence and innovation in the healthy towns programme in England: a qualitative stakeholder interview study.

Denise May Goodwin, Steven Cummins, Elena Sautkina, David Ogilvie, Mark Petticrew, Andy Jones, Katy Wheeler, Martin White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Domains of Capacity Building in Whole-Systems Approaches to Prevent Obesity-A "Systematized" Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Decision support for risk prioritisation of environmental health hazards in a UK city.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Denise May GoodwinSchool of Geography, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.
Steven Cummins
Elena Sautkina
David Ogilvie
Mark Petticrew
Andy Jones
Katy Wheeler
Martin White

Funding

Department of Health 0620026Department of Health SRF-2010-03-05Medical Research Council G0900686Medical Research Council MC_U106179474Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/4Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/6Wellcome Trust 087636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2008, the Healthy Community Challenge Fund commissioned nine 'healthy towns' in England to implement and evaluate community-based environmental interventions to prevent obesity. This paper examines the role of evidence in informing intervention development, innovation and the potential for programmes to contribute to the evidence base on the effectiveness of interventions that tackle population obesity.

methodTwenty qualitative interviews with local programme stakeholders and national policy actors were conducted. Interview transcripts were coded and thematically analysed. Initial analyses were guided by research questions regarding the nature and role of evidence in the development and implementation of the healthy towns programme and the capacity for evidence generation to inform future intervention design, policy and practice.

findingsStakeholders relied on local anecdotal and observational evidence to guide programme development. While the programme was considered an opportunity to trial new and innovative approaches, the requirement to predict likely health impacts and adopt evidence-based practice was viewed contradictory to this aim. Stakeholders believed there were missed opportunities to add to the existing empirical evidence base due to a lack of clarity and planning, particularly around timing, in local and national evaluations.

conclusionsA strong emphasis on relying on existing evidence-based practice and producing positive impacts and outcomes may have impeded the opportunity to implement truly innovative programmes because of fear of failure. Building more time for development, implementation and evaluation into future initiatives would maximise the use and generation of robust and relevant evidence for public health policy and practice.

Indexed as

Diffusion of InnovationEvidence-Based MedicineHealthy People ProgramsEnglandHealth PromotionHumansInterviews as TopicObesityOrganizational InnovationProgram DevelopmentPublic PolicyQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID23002433
PMCPMC3684795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.