Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23002356›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2012

Use of the tumor necrosis factor-blockers for Crohn's disease.

Alan B R Thomson, Milli Gupta, Hugh J Freeman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Adalimumab for induction of remission in Crohn's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Granulomas in the gastrointestinal tract: deciphering the Pandora's box.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Inflammatory bowel disease: clinical aspects and treatments.Journal of inflammation research · 2014
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alan B R ThomsonDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada. abrthomson@gmail.com
Milli Gupta
Hugh J Freeman
Western University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy for inflammatory bowel disease represents the most important advance in the care of these patients since the publication of the National Co-operative Crohn's disease study thirty years ago. The recommendations of numerous consensus groups worldwide are now supported by a wealth of clinical trials and several meta-analyses. In general, it is suggested that tumor necrosis factor-α blockers (TNFBs) are indicated (1) for persons with moderately-severe Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis (UC) who have failed two or more causes of glucocorticosteroids and an acceptably long cause (8 wk to 12 wk) of an immune modulator such as azathioprine or methotrexate; (2) non-responsive perianal disease; and (3) severe UC not responding to a 3-d to 5-d course of steroids. Once TNFBs have been introduced and the patient is responsive, therapy given by the IV and SC rate must be continued. It remains open to definitive evidence if concomitant immune modulators are required with TNFB maintenance therapy, and when or if TNFB may be weaned and discontinued. The supportive evidence from a single study on the role of early versus later introduction of TNFB in the course of a patient's illness needs to be confirmed. The risk/benefit profile of TNFB appears to be acceptable as long as the patient is immunized and tested for tuberculosis and viral hepatitis before the initiation of TNFB, and as long as the long-term adverse effects on the development of lymphoma and other tumors do not prone to be problematic. Because the rates of benefits to TNFB are modest from a population perspective and the cost of therapy is very high, the ultimate application of use of TNFBs will likely be established by cost/benefit studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsCost-Benefit AnalysisCrohn DiseaseDrug CostsDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsPatient SelectionPractice Guidelines as TopicRemission InductionRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment FailureTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaImmunosuppressive AgentsTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAdalimumabAdverse effectsCertolizumab pegolCrohn's diseaseEconomic evaluationInfliximabSecondary lack of responseUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID23002356
PMCPMC3447266
OpenAlexW2083025599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.