Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23002335›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2012

Diagnostic endoscopic ultrasonography: assessment of safety and prevention of complications.

Christian Jenssen, Maria Victoria Alvarez-Sánchez, Bertrand Napoléon, Siegbert Faiss

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04161950 (Prospective Comparison of Two EUS System for Clinical Performance), which is not on this map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04161950 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Comparison of Two EUS System for Clinical Performance

TypeobservationalSponsorPeking Union Medical College HospitalRan2019 to 2022Enrolled130ConditionsEndosonographyArmsAssessment of the safety and validity of echoendoscope
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Pelvic Space-Occupying Lesions Via Rectal Endoscopic Ultrasound.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Esophageal endoscopic findings after pulmonary vein and posterior wall isolation using pulsed field ablation: results from the Eso-PFA study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian JenssenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch-Oderland GmbH, D15344 Strausberg, Germany. c.jenssen@khmol.de
Maria Victoria Alvarez-Sánchez
Bertrand Napoléon
Siegbert Faiss
Krankenhaus Märkisch-Oderland · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has gained wide acceptance as an important, minimally invasive diagnostic tool in gastroenterology, pulmonology, visceral surgery and oncology. This review focuses on data regarding risks and complications of non-interventional diagnostic EUS and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB). Measures to improve the safety of EUS und EUS-FNB will be discussed. Due to the specific mechanical properties of echoendoscopes in EUS, there is a low but noteworthy risk of perforation. To minimize this risk, endoscopists should be familiar with the specific features of their equipment and their patients' specific anatomical situations (e.g., tumor stenosis, diverticula). Most diagnostic EUS complications occur during EUS-FNB. Pain, acute pancreatitis, infection and bleeding are the primary adverse effects, occurring in 1% to 2% of patients. Only a few cases of needle tract seeding and peritoneal dissemination have been reported. The mortality associated with EUS and EUS-FNB is 0.02%. The risks associated with EUS-FNB are affected by endoscopist experience and target lesion. EUS-FNB of cystic lesions is associated with an increased risk of infection and hemorrhage. Peri-interventional antibiotics are recommended to prevent cyst infection. Adequate education and training, as well consideration of contraindications, are essential to minimize the risks of EUS and EUS-FNB. Restricting EUS-FNB only to patients in whom the cytopathological results may be expected to change the course of management is the best way of reducing the number of complications.

Indexed as

BacteremiaBiopsy, Fine-NeedleEndosonographyEsophageal PerforationHumansIntestinal PerforationNeoplasm SeedingNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPancreatitisPeritonitisRisk FactorsAcute pancreatitisBleedingComplicationsContraindicationsEndoscopic ultrasonographyEndoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsyInfectionPerforationRiskSafety

Identifiers

PMID23002335
PMCPMC3442204
OpenAlexW2062445440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.