SynthesisJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2012
Longitudinal FEV1 dose-response model for inhaled PF-00610355 and salmeterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Synthesis in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dissociated Agonist of Glucocorticoid Receptor or Prednisone for Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: Effects on P1NP and Osteocalcin Pharmacodynamics.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2017Trial
- Quantitative characterization of circadian rhythm of pulmonary function in asthmatic patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2015Trial
- The Potential of Disease Progression Modeling to Advance Clinical Development and Decision Making.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Review
- Translational model to predict pulmonary pharmacokinetics and efficacy in man for inhaled bronchodilators.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2018Article
- Predicted heart rate effect of inhaled PF-00610355, a long acting β-adrenoceptor agonist, in volunteers and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this work was to characterize the dose-response relationship between two inhaled long-acting beta agonists (PF-00610355 and salmeterol) and the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) in order to inform dosing recommendations for future clinical trials in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This meta-analysis of four studies included 8,513 FEV1 measurements from 690 patients with moderate COPD. A longitudinal kinetic-pharmacodynamic (K-PD) model was developed and adequately described changes in FEV1 measurements over time, including circadian patterns within a day, as well as changes in FEV1 measurements elicited from administration of PF-00610355 or salmeterol. The fine-particle dose, the amount of drug present in particles small enough for lung delivery, was used as the exposure measure for PF-00610355. Greater reversibility following administration of a short-acting beta agonist during run-in was associated with increased FEV1 response to long-acting beta agonists (through an increased maximal response, E(max)). Simulations were conducted to better understand the response to PF-00610355 relative to placebo and salmeterol. The results of the simulations show that once daily fine-particle doses of 28.1 μg versus placebo have a moderate probability of providing an average improvement above 100 mL at trough. The 50 μg fine-particle dose, on the other hand, has a greater than 0.78 probability of achieving a 120 mL improvement versus placebo at trough. From an efficacy perspective and assuming a fine-particle fraction of 25 % for the Phase 3 formulation; 100 and 200 μg once daily nominal doses would be of interest to investigate in future Phase 3 trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.