Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23001336›Full record

ReviewAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2013

Application of quantitative PCR for the detection of microorganisms in water.

Marelize Botes, Michéle de Kwaadsteniet, Thomas Eugene Cloete

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reactive Quantum Dot-Based FRET Systems for Target-Catalyzed Detection of RNA.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Optimization ofJournal of environmental engineering (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Enhanced Detection of ViableMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marelize BotesDepartment of Microbiology, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag XI, Matieland 7602, Stellenbosch, Western Cape 7602, South Africa. mbr@sun.ac.za
Michéle de Kwaadsteniet
Thomas Eugene Cloete

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The occurrence of microorganisms in water due to contamination is a health risk and control thereof is a necessity. Conventional detection methods may be misleading and do not provide rapid results allowing for immediate action. The quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method has proven to be an effective tool to detect and quantify microorganisms in water within a few hours. Quantitative PCR assays have recently been developed for the detection of specific adeno- and polyomaviruses, bacteria and protozoa in different water sources. The technique is highly sensitive and able to detect low numbers of microorganisms. Quantitative PCR can be applied for microbial source tracking in water sources, to determine the efficiency of water and wastewater treatment plants and act as a tool for risk assessment. Different qPCR assays exist depending on whether an internal control is used or whether measurements are taken at the end of the PCR reaction (end-point qPCR) or in the exponential phase (real-time qPCR). Fluorescent probes are used in the PCR reaction to hybridise within the target sequence to generate a signal and, together with specialised systems, quantify the amount of PCR product. Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (q-RT-PCR) is a more sensitive technique that detects low copy number RNA and can be applied to detect, e.g. enteric viruses and viable microorganisms in water, and measure specific gene expression. There is, however, a need to standardise qPCR protocols if this technique is to be used as an analytical diagnostic tool for routine monitoring. This review focuses on the application of qPCR in the detection of microorganisms in water.

Indexed as

Water MicrobiologyBacteriaBacteriological TechniquesCalibrationChemistry Techniques, AnalyticalFluorescent DyesGene DosageGene Expression RegulationNucleic AcidsPolymerase Chain ReactionProtozoan ProteinsQuality ControlReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRiskRisk AssessmentSewageFluorescent DyesNucleic AcidsProtozoan ProteinsSewageWater

Identifiers

PMID23001336
PMCPMC7079929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.