ArticleMedical molecular morphology2012
Composite paraganglioma and ganglioneuroma in the retroperitoneum: a case report.
Article in Medical molecular morphology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Composite pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma-ganglioneuroma: analysis of SDH and ATRX status, and identification of frequent HRAS and BRAF mutations.Endocrine connections · 2021Article
- Update on Adrenal Tumours in 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) of Endocrine Tumours.Endocrine pathology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reports of a composite paraganglioma (PG) and ganglioneuroma (GN) in the retroperitoneum are rare. In the present case, dynamic computed tomographic (CT) findings showed a 30 × 22 × 20 mm tumor that was located in the retroperitoneum and which was dissociated from pancreatic tissue and the left adrenal gland. The markedly reddish tumor showed a clear margin and central multicystic changes on the cut surface. The tumor was composed of two major components, the PG and the GN. The paraganglionic cells in the PG component, which were arranged in a nested pattern, occupied the main and central part of the tumor. Both ganglionic cells and Schwann cells in the GN were located in a unorganized pattern in the periphery. The paraganglionic cells exhibited a Zellballen pattern, which consisted of an association of edematous vascular-rich stroma and focal hemorrhage, resulting in multicystic changes. These centrally located tumor cells were pleomorphic in part and did not have mitotic figures. In the periphery, Schwann cells, which were arranged in an obscure and fascicular pattern that was intermingled with large ganglionic cells, were located adjacent to the PG component with a mostly sharp margin. With higher magnification, the border was not as sharp, as revealed especially with chromogranin-A immunostain, in which both the PG and GN components were focally intermingled with each other. The histogenesis of the composite PG and GN was thought to be extraadrenal neural crest cells in the retroperitoneum because the tumor was not located in the adrenal gland or the Zuckerkandl organ, according to the CT findings. The immunohistochemical findings of this rare case of a composite PG and GN in the retroperitoneum are reported with a focus on the peculiar arrangement of these two components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.