Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23001287›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2013

(18)F-FDG uptake at initial staging of the adrenocortical cancers: a diagnostic tool but not of prognostic value.

L Tessonnier, C Ansquer, C Bournaud, F Sebag, E Mirallié, J C Lifante, F F Palazzo, I Morange, D Drui, C de la Foucardère and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prognostic role of pretreatment [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Role ofReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2023
    Article
  4. Oncocytic Adrenocortical Carcinoma With LowJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Disease State Clinical Review on the Evaluation and Management of Adrenocortical Carcinoma in an Adult: a Practical Approach.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

L TessonnierDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, La Timone University Hospital, CERIMED, Aix-Marseille University, 264 rue Saint-Pierre, 13385 Marseille Cedex 5, France.
C Ansquer
C Bournaud
F Sebag
E Mirallié
J C Lifante
F F Palazzo
I Morange
D Drui
C de la Foucardère
J Mancini
D Taïeb

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare cancer for which little level evidence exists to guide management. (18)F-FDG PET ((18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography) is an increasingly used diagnostic tool in patients with suspicious or indeterminate adrenal tumors. In some other solid tumors, (18)F-FDG PET may offer prognostic information that can guide optimal patient treatment. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether preoperative (18)F-FDG PET based on SUVs assessments has a prognostic value in ACC patients.

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed in patients who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of ACC. Inclusion criteria were an unequivocal diagnosis of ACC; all data from primary diagnosis available; (18)F-FDG PET/CT performed prior to surgery or other treatment of the primary tumor; a minimum of 6-months follow-up for surviving patients. All (18)F-FDG PET/CT procedures were reinterpreted in a blind fashion.

resultsThirty-seven patients (23 without metastasis [M0], 14 with metastasis [M1]) fulfilled the study criteria. Median uptake values were tumor standardized uptake values (SUV)(max) = 11 (range: 3-56) and a tumor/liver SUV(max) ratio = 4.2 (range: 1.3-15). Median follow-up was 20 months. Although classic risk factors (tumoral stage, Weiss score) were associated with poor outcome, there was no correlation between primary tumor FDG uptake with overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) in M0 patients and with overall survival in M1 patients. (18)F-FDG uptake correlated inconsistently with sinister histological features, such as atypical mitoses or necrosis.

conclusionsAt initial staging, primary tumor FDG uptake in ACC patients does not correlate with OS and DFS at 2 years. Patient prognosis and treatment strategy should not be based on uptake values.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Positron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsAdrenal Cortex NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.