Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23001263›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2012

Predictors of male partner treatment for sexually transmitted infection.

Gina M Secura, Fidel A Desir, Jennifer L Mullersman, Tessa Madden, Jenifer E Allsworth, Jeffrey F Peipert

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01986439 (The Contraceptive Choice Project), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01986439 unknown statusnot on this map

The Contraceptive Choice Project

TypeobservationalSponsorEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)Ran2007 to 2016Enrolled9,256ConditionsUnintended Pregnancy, Teen Births, Abortion, Contraception
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Adolescent patient preferences surrounding partner notification and treatment for sexually transmitted infections.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gina M SecuraDivision of Clinical Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. securag@wudosis.wustl.edu
Fidel A Desir
Jennifer L Mullersman
Tessa Madden
Jenifer E Allsworth
Jeffrey F Peipert
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH CAREERS IN WOMEN'S HEALTHK12HD001459 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SEMENKOVICH, CLAY F. · 2000 to 2014
$6.9M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001459NICHD NIH HHS K12HD001459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-initiated notification is a commonly used practice for notifying sex partners of possible exposure to a sexually transmitted infection (STI); however, 46% to 75% of partners are never treated. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project (CHOICE) is a longitudinal cohort study of women that provides no-cost contraception, STI testing, treatment to participants, and free partner treatment. Our objective was to evaluate characteristics of women who tested positive for chlamydia, gonorrhea, or trichomoniasis, and their association with successful partner treatment.

methodsWe analyzed baseline survey and STI testing, notification, and treatment data from the first 5087 participants enrolled in CHOICE. We considered "treated partners" to be men who received antibiotic treatment at the study clinic or by a prescription through the study. Independent predictors of successful partner treatment were identified using univariate analysis and multivariable analysis using Poisson regression with robust error variance.

resultsForty-four percent of male partners were successfully treated. Women whose partners were less likely to obtain treatment were black (adjusted Relative Risk (RR adj) RR adj = 0.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5-0.8) or reported some concern about future STI with the partner (RR adj = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.4, 0.8). Women whose partners were more likely to receive treatment were living with their partner (RR adj = 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1-1.8) or reported recent inconsistent condom use (RR adj = 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1-2.1).

conclusionsThe male partner treatment rate resulting from female patient-initiated partner notification in our study was low. Our findings highlight the need to develop novel notification interventions that yield higher partner treatment rates and consider patient-specific factors, such as race and relationship status.

Indexed as

Contact TracingHealth PromotionSexual PartnersAdolescentAdultChlamydia InfectionsCohort StudiesFemaleGonorrheaHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID23001263
PMCPMC3457019
OpenAlexW2061456796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.