ArticleInternational orthopaedics2012
Cysteine-rich matricellular protein improves callus regenerate in a rabbit trauma model.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- CCN1 as a compartment-specific biomarker of active microenvironmental remodeling: evidence from bone repair, aging, inflammation, and cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- CYR61 delivery promotes angiogenesis during bone fracture repair.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2025Article
- Metamizole does not affect fracture healing in a murine ischemia model.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor, stimulates angiogenesis and bone regeneration in an atrophic non-union model in mice.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Matrix-bound Cyr61/CCN1 is required to retain the properties of the bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell niche but is depleted with aging.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2022Article
- Sclareol inhibits RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis and promotes osteoblastogenesis through promoting CCN1 expression via repressing the MAPK pathway.Cell biology and toxicology · 2021Article
- CYR61/CCN1 Regulates Sclerostin Levels and Bone Maintenance.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2018Article
- The matricellular protein CCN1 in tissue injury repair.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2018Review
- The Role of Genetically Modified Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Urinary Bladder Regeneration.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOpen fractures with severe soft-tissue trauma are predisposed to poor bone healing. The vital coupling between osteo- and angiogenesis is disturbed. Cysteine-rich protein 61 (CYR61) is an angiogenic inducer promoting vascularisation. However, little is known about the effect of CYR61 on the callus regenerate after acute musculoskeletal trauma. Therefore, our aim was to determine whether local administration of CYR61: (1) has an influence on callus formation and remodelling, (2) increases bone volume and (3) partially restores callus stability.
methodsA musculoskeletal trauma was created in 20 rabbits. To simulate fracture-site debridement, the limb was shortened. In the test group, a CYR61-coated collagen matrix was locally applied around the osteotomy. After ten days, gradual distraction was commenced (0.5 mm/12 h) to restore the original length. New bone formation was evaluated histomorphometrically, radiographically and biomechanically.
resultsOsseus consolidation occured in all animals. Average maximum callus diameter was higher in the test group [1.39 mm; standard deviation (SD) = 0.078 vs 1.26 mm (SD = 0.14); p = 0.096]. In addition, bone volume was higher (p = 0.11) in the test group, with a mean value of 49.73 % (SD = 13.68) compared with 37.6 % (SD = 5.91). Torsional strength was significantly higher (p = 0.005) in the test group [105.43 % (SD = 31.68 %) vs. 52.57 % (SD = 24.39)]. Instead, stiffness of the newly reconstructed callus decreased (64.21 % (SD = 11.52) vs. 71.30 % (SD = 32.25) (p = 0.81)).
conclusionsCYR61 positively influences callus regenerate after acute trauma, not only histologically and radiographically but also biomechanically, most probably by a CYR61-associated pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.