Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22999913›Full record

ReviewDrug discovery today2013

Mechanistic systems modeling to guide drug discovery and development.

Brian J Schmidt, Jason A Papin, Cynthia J Musante

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug discovery today, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Expression of Cell-Adhesion Molecules inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. In silico methods for drug repurposing and pharmacology.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2016
    Review
  16. Agent-Based Modeling in Systems Pharmacology.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2015
    Article
  17. A multi-scale approach to designing therapeutics for tuberculosis.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2015
    Article
  18. Bridging Systems Medicine and Patient Needs.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2015
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brian J SchmidtDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0412, USA.
Jason A Papin
Cynthia J Musante

Funding

Network Analysis of Pathogenicity in Pseudomonas aeruginosaR01GM088244 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI PAPIN, JASON · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A crucial question that must be addressed in the drug development process is whether the proposed therapeutic target will yield the desired effect in the clinical population. Pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies place a large investment on research and development, long before confirmatory data are available from human trials. Basic science has greatly expanded the computable knowledge of disease processes, both through the generation of large omics data sets and a compendium of studies assessing cellular and systemic responses to physiologic and pathophysiologic stimuli. Given inherent uncertainties in drug development, mechanistic systems models can better inform target selection and the decision process for advancing compounds through preclinical and clinical research.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryModels, BiologicalAnimalsHumansPhenotypeResearch

Identifiers

PMID22999913
PMCPMC3644584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.