Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22998740›Full record

ArticleTransfusion2013

Motivation and social capital among prospective blood donors in three large blood centers in Brazil.

Thelma T Gonçalez, Claudia Di Lorenzo Oliveira, Anna Barbara F Carneiro-Proietti, Elizabeth C Moreno, Carolina Miranda, Nina Larsen, David Wright, Silvana Leão, Paula Loureiro, Cesar de Almeida-Neto and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Does Religiosity Predict Blood Donation in Brazil?Journal of religion and health · 2022
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Thelma T GonçalezDepartment of Epidemiology, Blood Systems Research Institute, San Francisco, California 94118, USA. tgoncalez@bloodsystems.org
Claudia Di Lorenzo Oliveira
Anna Barbara F Carneiro-Proietti
Elizabeth C Moreno
Carolina Miranda
Nina Larsen
David Wright
Silvana Leão
Paula Loureiro
Cesar de Almeida-Neto
Maria-Inês Lopes
Fernando A Proietti
Brian Custer
Ester Sabino
NHLBI Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study-II (REDS-II), International Component

Funding

NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268200417175C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies analyzing motivation factors that lead to blood donation have found altruism to be the primary motivation factor; however, social capital has not been analyzed in this context. Our study examines the association between motivation factors (altruism, self-interest, and response to direct appeal) and social capital (cognitive and structural) across three large blood centers in Brazil. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of 7635 donor candidates from October 15 through November 20, 2009. Participants completed self-administered questionnaires on demographics, previous blood donation, human immunodeficiency virus testing and knowledge, social capital, and donor motivations. Enrollment was determined before the donor screening process.

resultsAmong participants, 43.5 and 41.7% expressed high levels of altruism and response to direct appeal, respectively, while only 26.9% expressed high levels of self-interest. More high self-interest was observed at Hemope-Recife (41.7%). Of participants, 37.4% expressed high levels of cognitive social capital while 19.2% expressed high levels of structural social capital. More high cognitive and structural social capital was observed at Hemope-Recife (47.3 and 21.3%, respectively). High cognitive social capital was associated with high levels of altruism, self-interest, and response to direct appeal. Philanthropic and high social altruism were associated with high levels of altruism and response to direct appeal.

conclusionCognitive and structural social capital and social altruism are associated with altruism and response to direct appeal, while only cognitive social capital is associated with self-interest. Designing marketing campaigns with these aspects in mind may help blood banks attract potential blood donors more efficiently.

Indexed as

AltruismMotivationSocial ValuesAdolescentAdultAttitude to HealthBlood BanksBlood DonorsBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFemaleHumansMaleMultivariate AnalysisSelf Efficacy

Identifiers

PMID22998740
PMCPMC3542409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.