Trial reportLancet (London, England)2012
Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial.
Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 88 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
National, Cross-sectional, Multicenter Study to Estimate the Point Prevalence of Peripheral Intravenous Catheter-related Complications in Brazil: a Quality Improvement Study (PIVS)
Innovative Device for Intravenous Administration
A Comparison of 18-Gauge and 20-Gauge Intravenous Cannulas in Terms of Pain and Procedural Difficulty: A Randomized Controlled Trial in the Emergency Department
Who cites it
88 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparison of clinically indicated replacement and routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- ECO-SEOM-SEEO safety recommendations guideline for cancer patients receiving intravenous therapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020Guideline
- Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Devices and dressings to secure peripheral venous catheters to prevent complications.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Infusion phlebitis assessment measures: a systematic review.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2014Pooled it
- epic3: national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England.The Journal of hospital infection · 2014Guideline
- The effects of a new device on mechanical complications of short peripheral intravenous catheters: A randomized controlled trial.The journal of vascular access · 2026Trial
- Rapid local anesthesia in children enhanced by STAR particles: a first-in-humans, randomized clinical trial.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Trial
- Safety and Efficacy of Midline vs Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Among Adults Receiving IV Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Effects of a Clinically Indicated Peripheral Intravenous Replacement on Indwelling Time and Complications of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Trial
- Implementation and evaluation of short peripheral intravenous catheter flushing guidelines: a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial.BMC medicine · 2020Trial
- Preventing peripheral intravenous catheter failure by reducing mechanical irritation.Scientific reports · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Risk factors for complications in peripheral intravenous catheters in adults: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Closing the gap in vascular access safety for children with cancer in LMICs: a quality improvement initiative evaluating a PICC care bundle in pediatric oncology.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Routine Versus Clinically Indicated Replacement of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters in Adults: A Non-Inferiority Cluster-Randomised Crossover Trial.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Iatrogenic Fracture of a Peripheral Intravenous Cannula: A Case Report.Journal of caring sciences · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-Guided, Guidewire-Assisted Long Peripheral Catheter in the Great Saphenous Vein for Bilateral Upper Limb Fracture Surgery: A Case Report.Case reports in anesthesiology · 2026Article
28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe millions of peripheral intravenous catheters used each year are recommended for 72-96 h replacement in adults. This routine replacement increases health-care costs and staff workload and requires patients to undergo repeated invasive procedures. The effectiveness of the practice is not well established. Our hypothesis was that clinically indicated catheter replacement is of equal benefit to routine replacement.
methodsThis multicentre, randomised, non-blinded equivalence trial recruited adults (≥18 years) with an intravenous catheter of expected use longer than 4 days from three hospitals in Queensland, Australia, between May 20, 2008, and Sept 9, 2009. Computer-generated random assignment (1:1 ratio, no blocking, stratified by hospital, concealed before allocation) was to clinically indicated replacement, or third daily routine replacement. Patients, clinical staff, and research nurses could not be masked after treatment allocation because of the nature of the intervention. The primary outcome was phlebitis during catheterisation or within 48 h after removal. The equivalence margin was set at 3%. Primary analysis was by intention to treat. Secondary endpoints were catheter-related bloodstream and local infections, all bloodstream infections, catheter tip colonisation, infusion failure, catheter numbers used, therapy duration, mortality, and costs. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12608000445370.
findingsAll 3283 patients randomised (5907 catheters) were included in our analysis (1593 clinically indicated; 1690 routine replacement). Mean dwell time for catheters in situ on day 3 was 99 h (SD 54) when replaced as clinically indicated and 70 h (13) when routinely replaced. Phlebitis occurred in 114 of 1593 (7%) patients in the clinically indicated group and in 114 of 1690 (7%) patients in the routine replacement group, an absolute risk difference of 0·41% (95% CI -1·33 to 2·15%), which was within the prespecified 3% equivalence margin. No serious adverse events related to study interventions occurred.
interpretationPeripheral intravenous catheters can be removed as clinically indicated; this policy will avoid millions of catheter insertions, associated discomfort, and substantial costs in both equipment and staff workload. Ongoing close monitoring should continue with timely treatment cessation and prompt removal for complications.
fundingAustralian National Health and Medical Research Council.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22998716What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.