Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22998716›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2012

Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial.

Claire M Rickard, Joan Webster, Marianne C Wallis, Nicole Marsh, Matthew R McGrail, Venessa French, Lynelle Foster, Peter Gallagher, John R Gowardman, Li Zhang and 2 more

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 88 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03719287 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

National, Cross-sectional, Multicenter Study to Estimate the Point Prevalence of Peripheral Intravenous Catheter-related Complications in Brazil: a Quality Improvement Study (PIVS)

TypeobservationalSponsorSolventum US LLCRan2019 to 2019Enrolled295ConditionsInfusion Site Injury
NCT04046770 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Innovative Device for Intravenous Administration

TypeinterventionalSponsorEscola Superior de Enfermagem de CoimbraRan2020 to 2020Enrolled146ConditionsSafety Issues, Medical DeviceArmsDrug administration and Flushing procedure using Double-Chamber Syringe, Drug administration and Flushing procedure using Classic Syringe
NCT07629427 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Comparison of 18-Gauge and 20-Gauge Intravenous Cannulas in Terms of Pain and Procedural Difficulty: A Randomized Controlled Trial in the Emergency Department

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarmara University Pendik Training and Research HospitalRan2026 to 2026Enrolled204ConditionsPeripheral Catheterization, Veins, Emergency Department Patient, PainArms18-gauge peripheral intravenous cannula, 20-gauge peripheral intravenous cannula
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. ECO-SEOM-SEEO safety recommendations guideline for cancer patients receiving intravenous therapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Infusion phlebitis assessment measures: a systematic review.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2014
    Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Closing the gap in vascular access safety for children with cancer in LMICs: a quality improvement initiative evaluating a PICC care bundle in pediatric oncology.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Claire M RickardResearch Centre for Clinical and Community Practice Innovation, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia. c.rickard@griffith.edu.au
Joan Webster
Marianne C Wallis
Nicole Marsh
Matthew R McGrail
Venessa French
Lynelle Foster
Peter Gallagher
John R Gowardman
Li Zhang
Alice McClymont
Michael Whitby

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe millions of peripheral intravenous catheters used each year are recommended for 72-96 h replacement in adults. This routine replacement increases health-care costs and staff workload and requires patients to undergo repeated invasive procedures. The effectiveness of the practice is not well established. Our hypothesis was that clinically indicated catheter replacement is of equal benefit to routine replacement.

methodsThis multicentre, randomised, non-blinded equivalence trial recruited adults (≥18 years) with an intravenous catheter of expected use longer than 4 days from three hospitals in Queensland, Australia, between May 20, 2008, and Sept 9, 2009. Computer-generated random assignment (1:1 ratio, no blocking, stratified by hospital, concealed before allocation) was to clinically indicated replacement, or third daily routine replacement. Patients, clinical staff, and research nurses could not be masked after treatment allocation because of the nature of the intervention. The primary outcome was phlebitis during catheterisation or within 48 h after removal. The equivalence margin was set at 3%. Primary analysis was by intention to treat. Secondary endpoints were catheter-related bloodstream and local infections, all bloodstream infections, catheter tip colonisation, infusion failure, catheter numbers used, therapy duration, mortality, and costs. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12608000445370.

findingsAll 3283 patients randomised (5907 catheters) were included in our analysis (1593 clinically indicated; 1690 routine replacement). Mean dwell time for catheters in situ on day 3 was 99 h (SD 54) when replaced as clinically indicated and 70 h (13) when routinely replaced. Phlebitis occurred in 114 of 1593 (7%) patients in the clinically indicated group and in 114 of 1690 (7%) patients in the routine replacement group, an absolute risk difference of 0·41% (95% CI -1·33 to 2·15%), which was within the prespecified 3% equivalence margin. No serious adverse events related to study interventions occurred.

interpretationPeripheral intravenous catheters can be removed as clinically indicated; this policy will avoid millions of catheter insertions, associated discomfort, and substantial costs in both equipment and staff workload. Ongoing close monitoring should continue with timely treatment cessation and prompt removal for complications.

fundingAustralian National Health and Medical Research Council.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCatheterization, PeripheralCatheter-Related InfectionsDevice RemovalEquipment ContaminationFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPhlebitisQueenslandTime Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.