Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22998483›Full record

SynthesisBMC neurology2012

Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysm: a systematic review.

Jin Seub Hwang, Min Kyung Hyun, Hyun Joo Lee, Ji Eun Choi, Jong Hee Kim, Na Rae Lee, Jin-Won Kwon, EnJu Lee

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC neurology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Preventive clipping versus coiling in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review to explore safety and efficacy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Balloon inflation predicts recanalization of intracranial aneurysms treated with coiling alone.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  9. A novel histological occlusion classification for coiled aneurysms based on multiphoton microscopy.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in stent-assisted coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jin Seub HwangNational Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Changkyung B/D 8 F, 28-7 Wonnam-dong, Seoul, Jongno-gu 110-450, Korea.
Min Kyung Hyun
Hyun Joo Lee
Ji Eun Choi
Jong Hee Kim
Na Rae Lee
Jin-Won Kwon
EnJu Lee
National Evidenc- based healthcare Collaborating Agency · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare the effects of endovascular coiling and neurosurgical clipping in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysm.

methodsSixteen electronic databases were searched for articles published between 1950 and July 2010 to compare clinical outcomes of clipping and coiling. Researchers reviewed all searched articles and extracted data independently. The quality of studies and evidence were evaluated using MINORS and GRADEprofiler, respectively. The odds ratio (OR) was calculated using the inverse variance meta-analysis method for each study outcome. To assess heterogeneity of ORs across cohorts, Cochran's Q statistic and I² were used.

resultsOf 4160 studies, 24 were identified (n = 31865). Clipping resulted in significantly higher disability using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.33-4.26) and Modified Rankin Scale (OR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.42-5.63) when compared with coiling. ORs for complications were also higher with clipping (ORs for neurological and cardiac complications were 1.94 with a 95% confidence interval [CI] of 1.09-3.47 and 2.51 with a 95% CI of 1.15-5.50). Clipping resulted in significantly greater disability in the short term (≤6 m)(OR on the Glasgow Outcome Scale, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.16-6.34), but not in the long term (>6 m)(OR for Glasgow Outcome Scale, 2.12; 95% CI, 0.93-4.84).

conclusionsCoiling was a better procedure for treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysm in terms of disability, complications, especially in the short term. Because of the limitations of the reviewed studies, further studies are required to support the present results.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedComorbidityEndovascular ProceduresHumansIntracranial AneurysmNeurosurgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsPrevalenceRecovery of FunctionRisk AssessmentStroke

Identifiers

PMID22998483
PMCPMC3519507
OpenAlexW2025470414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.