Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22995575›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2012

BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR: a useful tool for evaluating bovine leukemia virus infection status.

Mayuko Jimba, Shin-Nosuke Takeshima, Hironobu Murakami, Junko Kohara, Naohiko Kobayashi, Tamako Matsuhashi, Takashi Ohmori, Tetsuo Nunoya, Yoko Aida

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. First Identification ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Polymorphism ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mayuko JimbaViral Infectious Diseases Unit, RIKEN, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.
Shin-Nosuke Takeshima
Hironobu Murakami
Junko Kohara
Naohiko Kobayashi
Tamako Matsuhashi
Takashi Ohmori
Tetsuo Nunoya
Yoko Aida
RIKEN · JPGifu Prefectural Research Institute for Forests · JPNippon Institute for Biological Science · JPHokkaido Research Organization · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBovine leukemia virus (BLV) is associated with enzootic bovine leukosis, which is the most common neoplastic disease of cattle. BLV infects cattle worldwide, imposing a severe economic impact on the dairy cattle industry. Recently, we developed a new quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method using Coordination of Common Motifs (CoCoMo) primers to measure the proviral load of known and novel BLV variants in BLV-infected animals. Indeed, the assay was highly effective in detecting BLV in cattle from a range of international locations. This assay enabled us to demonstrate that proviral load correlates not only with BLV infection capacity as assessed by syncytium formation, but also with BLV disease progression. In this study, we compared the sensitivity of our BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR method for detecting BLV proviruses with the sensitivities of two real-time PCR systems, and also determined the differences of proviral load with serotests.

resultsBLV-CoCoMo-qPCR was found to be highly sensitive when compared with the real-time PCR-based TaqMan MGB assay developed by Lew et al. and the commercial TaKaRa cycleave PCR system. The BLV copy number determined by BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR was only partially correlated with the positive rate for anti-BLV antibody as determined by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, passive hemagglutination reaction, or agar gel immunodiffusion. This result indicates that, although serotests are widely used for the diagnosis of BLV infection, it is difficult to detect BLV infection with confidence by using serological tests alone. Two cattle were experimentally infected with BLV. The kinetics of the provirus did not precisely correlate with the change in anti-BLV antibody production. Moreover, both reactions were different in cattle that carried different bovine leukocyte antigen (BoLA)-DRB3 genotypes.

conclusionsOur results suggest that the quantitative measurement of proviral load by BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR is useful tool for evaluating the progression of BLV-induced disease. BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR allows us to monitor the spread of BLV infection in different viewpoint compared with classical serotest.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ViralCattleDNA, ViralEnzootic Bovine LeukosisEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayGenomicsGenotypeHemagglutination TestsImmunodiffusionLeukemia Virus, BovinePolymerase Chain ReactionProvirusesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityViral LoadAntibodies, ViralDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID22995575
PMCPMC3489618
OpenAlexW2006315872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.