Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22995545›Full record

ArticleBrain research2012

Multi-sensory integration in brainstem and auditory cortex.

Gregory J Basura, Seth D Koehler, Susan E Shore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Connectional Modularity of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Multimodal Inputs to the Lateral Cortex of the Mouse Inferior Colliculus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Tinnitus: perspectives from human neuroimaging.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2015
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gregory J BasuraDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Kresge Hearing Research Inst., The University of Michigan, 1100W Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. gbasura@umich.edu
Seth D Koehler
Susan E Shore
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USMichigan Medicine · US

Funding

Sensory Mechanisms and Disorders - Administrative SupplementT32DC000011 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Michael Thomas Roberts · 1989 to 2026
$9.5M
Function of trigeminal pathways to the cochlear nucleusR01DC004825 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SHORE, SUSAN E · 2001 to 2016
$5.5M
PERCEPTUAL CONSEQUENCES OF COCHLEAR &STIMULUS MANIPULATIONSP01DC000078 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MIDDLEBROOKS, JOHN C. · 1988 to 2002
$4.1M
Role of serotonin in auditory cortex regulation following early-onset sensorineurR03DC009893 · NIDCD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BASURA, GREGORY JOSEPH · 2008 to 2009
$151k
NIDCD NIH HHS P01 DC00078NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004825NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC009893NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC009893-01NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000011NIDCD NIH HHS T32DC000011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tinnitus is the perception of sound in the absence of a physical sound stimulus. It is thought to arise from aberrant neural activity within central auditory pathways that may be influenced by multiple brain centers, including the somatosensory system. Auditory-somatosensory (bimodal) integration occurs in the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN), where electrical activation of somatosensory regions alters pyramidal cell spike timing and rates of sound stimuli. Moreover, in conditions of tinnitus, bimodal integration in DCN is enhanced, producing greater spontaneous and sound-driven neural activity, which are neural correlates of tinnitus. In primary auditory cortex (A1), a similar auditory-somatosensory integration has been described in the normal system (Lakatos et al., 2007), where sub-threshold multisensory modulation may be a direct reflection of subcortical multisensory responses (Tyll et al., 2011). The present work utilized simultaneous recordings from both DCN and A1 to directly compare bimodal integration across these separate brain stations of the intact auditory pathway. Four-shank, 32-channel electrodes were placed in DCN and A1 to simultaneously record tone-evoked unit activity in the presence and absence of spinal trigeminal nucleus (Sp5) electrical activation. Bimodal stimulation led to long-lasting facilitation or suppression of single and multi-unit responses to subsequent sound in both DCN and A1. Immediate (bimodal response) and long-lasting (bimodal plasticity) effects of Sp5-tone stimulation were facilitation or suppression of tone-evoked firing rates in DCN and A1 at all Sp5-tone pairing intervals (10, 20, and 40 ms), and greater suppression at 20 ms pairing-intervals for single unit responses. Understanding the complex relationships between DCN and A1 bimodal processing in the normal animal provides the basis for studying its disruption in hearing loss and tinnitus models. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Tinnitus Neuroscience.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionBrain StemCochlear NucleusData Interpretation, StatisticalElectric StimulationElectrophysiological PhenomenaFemaleGuinea PigsNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsPhysical StimulationTinnitusTrigeminal Nuclei

Identifiers

PMID22995545
PMCPMC3489970
OpenAlexW1989224280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.