Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22994848›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health dentistry2014

Use of online sources of information by dental practitioners: findings from The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Ellen Funkhouser, Bonita S Agee, Valeria V Gordan, D Brad Rindal, Jeffrey L Fellows, Vibeke Qvist, Jocelyn McClelland, Gregg H Gilbert, DPBRN Collaborative Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health dentistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Missed Opportunities for Detecting Alternative Nicotine Product Use in Youth: Data From the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ellen FunkhouserDivision of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA HealthPartners Dental Group, and HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA Department of Cariology and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark General dentistry private practice, Alabaster, AL, USA Department of General Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Bonita S Agee
Valeria V Gordan
D Brad Rindal
Jeffrey L Fellows
Vibeke Qvist
Jocelyn McClelland
Gregg H Gilbert
DPBRN Collaborative Group

Funding

The National Dental PBRNU19DE022516 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILBERT, GREGG H · 2012 to 2018
$66.4M
Dental PBRN Network ChairU01DE016747 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILBERT, GREGG H · 2005 to 2011
$17.3M
Dental Practice-Based Research Network Coordinating CtrU01DE016746 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI FUNKHOUSER, ELLEN M · 2005 to 2011
$7.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE016746NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE016747NIDCR NIH HHS U01-DE-16746NIDCR NIH HHS U01-DE-16747NIDCR NIH HHS U19 DE022516NIDCR NIH HHS U19-DE-22516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEstimate the proportion of dental practitioners who use online sources of information for practice guidance.

methodsFrom a survey of 657 dental practitioners in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network, four indicators of online use for practice guidance were calculated: read journals online, obtained continuing education (CDE) through online sources, rated an online source as most influential, and reported frequently using an online source for guidance. Demographics, journals read, and use of various sources of information for practice guidance in terms of frequency and influence were ascertained for each.

resultsOverall, 21 percent (n = 138) were classified into one of the four indicators of online use: 14 percent (n = 89) rated an online source as most influential and 13 percent (n = 87) reported frequently using an online source for guidance; few practitioners (5 percent, n = 34) read journals online, fewer (3 percent, n = 17) obtained CDE through online sources. Use of online information sources varied considerably by region and practice characteristics. In general, the four indicators represented practitioners with as many differences as similarities to each other and to offline users.

conclusionA relatively small proportion of dental practitioners use information from online sources for practice guidance. Variation exists regarding practitioners' use of online source resources and how they rate the value of offline information sources for practice guidance.

Indexed as

DentistsOnline SystemsFemaleHumansMaleUnited Statescontinuing educationdentalinformation sourcesonlinepractice based

Identifiers

PMID22994848
PMCPMC3883955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.