Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22994537›Full record

ArticleDrugs2012

Adjuvant therapy for high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumour: considerations for optimal management.

Heikki Joensuu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Follow-Up Practices of Surgeons and Medical Oncologists in Australia and New Zealand Following Resection of Esophagogastric Cancers.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2017
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prognostic value of Ki67 index in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2014
    Article
  11. Imatinib: a breakthrough of targeted therapy in cancer.Chemotherapy research and practice · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heikki JoensuuDepartment of Oncology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. heikki.joensuu@hus.fi
Helsinki University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One randomized trial has found that adjuvant treatment with imatinib for gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) 3 cm or larger in diameter prolongs recurrence-free survival, and another trial has reported that 3 years of adjuvant imatinib improves both recurrence-free and overall survival compared with 1 year of imatinib in high-risk GIST. The US National Comprehensive Cancer Network now recommends consideration of adjuvant imatinib for at least 3 years for patients with a high risk of GIST recurrence. Estimation of the risk of GIST recurrence is mandatory when considering adjuvant therapy. The risk varies greatly from negligible risk (tumours smaller than 1 cm) to 90% or greater risk (large tumours with frequent mitoses). The risk of recurrence can be estimated using one of the three validated risk stratification schemes, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus risk criteria, the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology criteria or the modified NIH criteria, which have roughly similar prognostic accuracy, or with nomograms or prognostic contour maps. Patients with an intermediate risk may pose a problem when considering adjuvant therapy because few research data are available. The decision about whether or not to treat these patients with adjuvant imatinib can be solved using the modified NIH risk stratification criteria, since, with these criteria, patients with intermediate risk have similar outcomes to those with low risk, leaving only patients with high risk for consideration of adjuvant therapy. Analysis of tumour tissue for KIT and PDGFRA mutations is recommended to exclude patients with imatinib-insensitive mutations from adjuvant therapy (notably patients with PDGFRA substitution mutation D842V), and those with neurofibromatosis-1-associated wild-type GIST. The standard daily dose of adjuvant imatinib is 400 mg, but it is unknown whether this dose is optimal. Some patients, such as those with KIT exon 9 mutation, might benefit from a higher dose. While the optimal duration of adjuvant therapy is also unknown, 3 years of adjuvant imatinib is currently a reasonable choice. Early detection and management of imatinib side effects is likely important for achieving high compliance. Repeat imaging of the abdomen with CT or MRI during adjuvant imatinib and after its completion is also likely to be beneficial, since most patients whose GIST recurs after adjuvant treatment respond to reinstitution of imatinib, and the presence of a small tumour burden when imatinib is reinstituted may reduce the likelihood of rapid emergence of a second mutation that confers imatinib resistance.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ManagementGastrointestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansImatinib MesylatePiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesImatinib MesylatePiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID22994537
OpenAlexW2258007900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.