Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22993576›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2010

Immunohistochemical assessment of primary breast tumors and metachronous brain metastases, with particular regard to differences in the expression of biological markers and prognosis.

Yawara Omoto, Masafumi Kurosumi, Yasuo Hozumi, Hanako Oba, Kaori Kawanowa, Hiroyuki Takei, Yoshikazu Yasuda

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 80% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Yawara OmotoDepartments of Pathology, and ; Divisions of Breast and General Surgery, and.
Masafumi Kurosumi
Yasuo Hozumi
Hanako Oba
Kaori Kawanowa
Hiroyuki Takei
Yoshikazu Yasuda
Saitama Cancer Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we conducted an immunohistochemical analysis of primary breast tumors and metachronous brain metastases to compare the differences in the expression of biological markers between the two. Carcinoma tissues from primary breast tumors and metachronous brain metastases collected from 21 patients were examined immunohistochemically for the expression status of the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2, Ki-67, bcl-2 and p53, and the results were compared. In addition, the relationships between the expression of these factors and prognosis were evaluated. There were no significant differences in the frequencies of ER-, PgR-, HER-2-, bcl-2- or p53-positivity between the primary breast tumors and metachronous brain metastases. While the Ki-67 labeling index (LI) was high in both the primary breast tumors and brain metastases, it was significantly higher in the brain metastases than in the corresponding primary breast tumors (P=0.003). With regard to the prognosis, breast cancer patients who showed ER-positivity in the primary tumors showed significantly longer survival after primary diagnosis (P=0.0076). Furthermore, breast cancer patients who exhibited ER-positivity, bcl-2-positivity or p53-negativity in the primary tumors showed significantly longer intervals from primary diagnosis to the detection of the brain metastases. Of all the markers, only the Ki-67 LI was significantly higher in the brain metastases than in the primary breast tumors. We confirmed that the tumor characteristics were worse in the metachronous brain metastases.

Identifiers

PMID22993576
PMCPMC3445894
OpenAlexW2145418587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.