Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22993178›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2012

Optimization of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry analysis for bacterial identification.

Prasanna D Khot, Marc R Couturier, Andrew Wilson, Ann Croft, Mark A Fisher

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluating the Autof MS2600 vs. Biotyper Sirius MALDI-TOF MS: a head-to-head study for routine microbial identification in a university clinical microbiology laboratory.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Antimicrobial Resistance inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Low incidence of cytolysin-positiveGut microbes reports · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Differentiation betweenInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Genotype classification ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Performance of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry in the Philippines.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. MALDI-TOF MS Biomarker Detection Models to Distinguish RTX Toxin Phenotypes ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Microorganisms · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Prasanna D KhotARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Marc R Couturier
Andrew Wilson
Ann Croft
Mark A Fisher

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is a relatively new addition to the clinical microbiology laboratory. The performance of the MALDI Biotyper system (Bruker Daltonics) was compared to those of phenotypic and genotypic identification methods for 690 routine and referred clinical isolates representing 102 genera and 225 unique species. We systematically compared direct-smear and extraction methods on a taxonomically diverse collection of isolates. The optimal score thresholds for bacterial identification were determined, and an approach to address multiple divergent results above these thresholds was evaluated. Analysis of identification scores revealed optimal species- and genus-level identification thresholds of 1.9 and 1.7, with 91.9% and 97.0% of isolates correctly identified to species and genus levels, respectively. Not surprisingly, routinely encountered isolates showed higher concordance than did uncommon isolates. The extraction method yielded higher scores than the direct-smear method for 78.3% of isolates. Incorrect species were reported in the top 10 results for 19.4% of isolates, and although there was no obvious cutoff to eliminate all of these ambiguities, a 10% score differential between the top match and additional species may be useful to limit the need for additional testing to reach single-species-level identifications.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial InfectionsBacterial Typing TechniquesBacteriological TechniquesHumansMolecular TypingSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization

Identifiers

PMID22993178
PMCPMC3502975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.