Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22993147›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2012

Evidence supporting a zoonotic origin of human coronavirus strain NL63.

Jeremy Huynh, Shimena Li, Boyd Yount, Alexander Smith, Leslie Sturges, John C Olsen, Juliet Nagel, Joshua B Johnson, Sudhakar Agnihothram, J Edward Gates and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 180 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
180citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
18.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

180 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 284 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Bacterial Composition Across Bat Species: A Human Health Perspective.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Corona- and Paramyxoviruses in Bats from Brazil: A Matter of Concern?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

120 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeremy HuynhDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Shimena Li
Boyd Yount
Alexander Smith
Leslie Sturges
John C Olsen
Juliet Nagel
Joshua B Johnson
Sudhakar Agnihothram
J Edward Gates
Matthew B Frieman
Ralph S Baric
Eric F Donaldson
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental Science · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Yessinia autotransporters (Yaps): Structure, function, and host responseU54AI057157 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SEMPOWSKI, GREGORY D · 2003 to 2013
$91.4M
NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI057157NIAID NIH HHS U54-AI057157PI
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between bats and coronaviruses (CoVs) has received considerable attention since the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-like CoV was identified in the Chinese horseshoe bat (Rhinolophidae) in 2005. Since then, several bats throughout the world have been shown to shed CoV sequences, and presumably CoVs, in the feces; however, no bat CoVs have been isolated from nature. Moreover, there are very few bat cell lines or reagents available for investigating CoV replication in bat cells or for isolating bat CoVs adapted to specific bat species. Here, we show by molecular clock analysis that alphacoronavirus (α-CoV) sequences derived from the North American tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavus) are predicted to share common ancestry with human CoV (HCoV)-NL63, with the most recent common ancestor between these viruses occurring approximately 563 to 822 years ago. Further, we developed immortalized bat cell lines from the lungs of this bat species to determine if these cells were capable of supporting infection with HCoVs. While SARS-CoV, mouse-adapted SARS-CoV (MA15), and chimeric SARS-CoVs bearing the spike genes of early human strains replicated inefficiently, HCoV-NL63 replicated for multiple passages in the immortalized lung cells from this bat species. These observations support the hypothesis that human CoVs are capable of establishing zoonotic-reverse zoonotic transmission cycles that may allow some CoVs to readily circulate and exchange genetic material between strains found in bats and other mammals, including humans.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenyAnimalsBase SequenceBayes TheoremBlotting, WesternCell LineChiropteraComputational BiologyCoronavirus InfectionsCoronavirus NL63, HumanFecesFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansLikelihood FunctionsMaryland

Identifiers

PMID22993147
PMCPMC3497669
OpenAlexW2008811126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.