ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2013
Relationship between recommended chronic heart failure treatments and mortality over 8 years in real-world conditions: a pharmacoepidemiological study.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association is not causation: treatment effects cannot be estimated from observational data in heart failure.European heart journal · 2018Pooled it
- Use of Statins in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Current Evidence and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Therapeutic implications of statins in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a review of current literature.F1000Research · 2021Review
- Statin Treatment and Clinical Outcomes of Heart Failure Among Africans: An Inverse Probability Treatment Weighted Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017Article
- The Association Between Alcohol Consumption and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: An Observational Study on a General Population.Medicine · 2016Observational
- Factors associated with β-blocker initiation and discontinuation in a population-based cohort of seniors newly diagnosed with heart failure.Patient preference and adherence · 2016Article
- Review of novel therapeutic targets for improving heart failure treatment based on experimental and clinical studies.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2016Review
- Lipophilic versus hydrophilic statin therapy for heart failure: a protocol for an adjusted indirect comparison meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2013Article
- Statins in heart failure: do we need another trial?Vascular health and risk management · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe previously reported that chronic heart failure (CHF) treatments reduce the duration of hospitalisation, even in elderly patients. The present study aimed to determine whether CHF treatment also provides long-term benefits in terms of reduced mortality at 8 years.
methodsA cohort of 281 patients who were admitted to a French teaching hospital with a main diagnosis of CHF were followed through the health insurance databases for 1 year and through the national mortality database for 8 years.
resultsDiuretics (236 patients, 84 %) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (193 patients, 69 %) were the most-frequently prescribed medications. The median duration of survival was 46 months. Mortality rates were significantly lower for patients administered beta-blockers (59 %) and statins (56 %) than for patients not exposed to these drugs (82 %, p < 0.001 and 78 %, p = 0.001 respectively). No significant differences in mortality were observed for spironolactone, diuretics or ACE inhibitors. After adjustment, beta-blocker treatment remained associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality (hazard ratio, HR = 0.54 [0.34-0.84]). After adjustment, the use of two or three CHF drugs was associated with longer survival (HR = 0.53 [0.36-0.77]) than the use of zero or one CHF drug. Statins were also associated with longer survival after adjustment (HR = 0.53 [0.31-0.89]). In patients 75 years of age or older (n = 73), only beta-blocker treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality (HR = 0.31 [0.16-0.63]) in multivariate analysis.
conclusionsThe use of beta-blockers was associated with better survival rates. The use of statins was also associated with better survival at 8 years. Randomised controlled trials are required to confirm these observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22993100What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.