Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22992624›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of clinical oncology2013

Factors associated with use of preoperative chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium.

Mary E Charlton, Chi Lin, Dingfeng Jiang, Karyn B Stitzenberg, Thorvardur R Halfdanarson, Jane F Pendergast, Elizabeth A Chrischilles, Robert B Wallace

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of clinical oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Surgeon-Level Variation in Utilization of Local Staging and Neoadjuvant Therapy for Stage II-III Rectal Adenocarcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Hospital Characteristics Associated with Stage II/III Rectal Cancer Guideline Concordant Care: Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare Data.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mary E CharltonDepartments of *Epidemiology §Biostatistics, University of Iowa College of Public Health †VA Office of Rural Health, Veterans Rural Health Resource Center-Central Region, Iowa City VA Health Care System ¶Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Blood & Marrow Transplantation, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA ‡Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE ∥Department of Surgical Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Chi Lin
Dingfeng Jiang
Karyn B Stitzenberg
Thorvardur R Halfdanarson
Jane F Pendergast
Elizabeth A Chrischilles
Robert B Wallace
University of Iowa · USIowa City VA Health Care System · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Mark E Burkard · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
PROPENSITY SCORES IN HIERARCHICAL MODELSU01CA093344 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI AYANIAN, JOHN Z., FOUAD, MONA N. · 2001 to 2011
$19.5M
Lung/Colon Cancer Outcomes--Cancer Research NetworkU01CA093332 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI WEEKS, JANE C. · 2001 to 2008
$7.4M
RAND-UCLA CanCORS PDCR ApplicationU01CA093348 · NCI · RAND CORPORATION · PI KAHN, KATHERINE LESLIE · 2001 to 2008
$7.3M
Cancer Care Outcomes Research &Surveillance ConsortiumU01CA093324 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI AYANIAN, JOHN Z. · 2001 to 2008
$7.1M
RACIAL DISPARITIES IN END OF LIFE CARE--ACCESSU01CA093329 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI FOUAD, MONA N. · 2001 to 2008
$6.6M
NC Colorectal Cancer Care Outcomes Research StudyU01CA093326 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SANDLER, ROBERT S. · 2001 to 2008
$4.3M
Lung Cancer Care Outcomes/Surveillance Consortium-IowaU01CA093339 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI WALLACE, ROBERT BRUCE · 2001 to 2008
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA086862NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093324NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093326NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093329NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093332NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093339NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093344NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePreoperative (preop) chemoradiation therapy (CRT) improves local control and reduces toxicity more than postoperative (postop) CRT for the treatment of stages II/III rectal cancer, but studies suggest that many patients still receive postop CRT. We examined patient beliefs and clinical and provider characteristics associated with receipt of recommended therapy.

methodsWe identified stages II/III rectal cancer patients who had primary site resection and CRT among subjects in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium, a population-based and health system-based prospective cohort of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients from 2003 to 2005. Patient surveys and abstracted medical records were used to construct variables and determine sequence of CRT and surgery. Logistic regression was used to model the association between predictors and receipt of preop CRT.

resultsOf the 201 patients, 66% received preop and 34% received postop CRT. Those visiting a medical oncologist and/or radiation oncologist before a surgeon had a 96% (95% confidence interval, 92%-100%) predicted probability of receiving preop CRT, compared with 48% (95% confidence interval, 41%-55%) for those visiting a surgeon first. Among those visiting a surgeon first, documentation of recommended staging procedures was associated with receiving preop CRT.

conclusionsSequence of provider visits and documentation of recommended staging procedures were important predictors of receiving preop CRT. Initial multidisciplinary evaluation led to better adherence to CRT guidelines. Further evaluation of provider characteristics, referral patterns, and related health system processes should be undertaken to inform targeted interventions to reduce variation from recommended care.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedChemoradiotherapyConfidence IntervalsData CollectionFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMedical RecordsMiddle AgedPhysiciansPostoperative PeriodPreoperative CareRectal NeoplasmsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID22992624
PMCPMC3556239
OpenAlexW2027745241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.