Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22992592›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2012

Endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria contacts: function of the junction.

Ashley A Rowland, Gia K Voeltz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 565 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
565citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
24.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

565 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 994 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. ATL2 Recruits TRAK1 to Promote Mitochondrial Transport at ER-Mitochondria Contact Sites.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Engineering of plant-derived P450scc forSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Organelle contact sites in cancer cells.Cell death & disease · 2026
    Review
  20. Article

505 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ashley A RowlandDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, 80309, USA.
Gia K Voeltz
University of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

MOLECULAR BIOLOGYT32GM007135 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI KRAUTER, KENNETH S · 1985 to 2012
$5.7M
Reticulon Function in ER MorphologyR01GM083977 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI VOELTZ, GIA · 2009 to 2017
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM07135NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083977NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM083977NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most well-characterized organelle contact sites are those between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria. Increased understanding is being gained of how ER-mitochondria contact sites are organized and which factors converge at this interface, some of which may provide a tethering function. The role of the ER-mitochondria junction in coordinating the functions of these two organelles is also becoming clearer, and it has been shown to be involved in the regulation of lipid synthesis, Ca(2+) signalling and the control of mitochondrial biogenesis and intracellular trafficking.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalcium SignalingEndoplasmic ReticulumLipidsMitochondriaMitochondrial MembranesMitochondrial TurnoverProtein TransportSignal TransductionLipids

Identifiers

PMID22992592
PMCPMC5111635
OpenAlexW2117692658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.