Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22992466›Full record

ReviewChannels (Austin, Tex.)

Voltage-gated sodium channels and metastatic disease.

William J Brackenbury

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Channels (Austin, Tex.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Voltage-gated NaPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects of NaCell biochemistry and biophysics · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Metal Ion Signaling in Biomedicine.Chemical reviews · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Advances in the understanding of nuclear pore complexes in human diseases.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  15. Disrupting NaCancer & metabolism · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

William J BrackenburyDepartment of Biology, University of York, York, UK. william.brackenbury@york.ac.uk

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000508Medical Research Council G1000508(95657)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voltage-gated Na (+) channels (VGSCs) are macromolecular protein complexes containing a pore-forming α subunit and smaller non-pore-forming β subunits. VGSCs are expressed in metastatic cells from a number of cancers. In these cells, Na (+) current carried by α subunits enhances migration, invasion and metastasis in vivo. In contrast, the β subunits mediate cellular adhesion and process extension. The prevailing hypothesis is that VGSCs are upregulated in cancer, in general favoring an invasive/metastatic phenotype, although the mechanisms are still not fully clear. Expression of the Nav 1.5 α subunit associates with poor prognosis in clinical breast cancer specimens, suggesting that VGSCs may have utility as prognostic markers for cancer progression. Furthermore, repurposing existing VGSC-blocking therapeutic drugs may provide a new strategy to improve outcomes in patients suffering from metastatic disease, which is the major cause of cancer-related deaths, and for which there is currently no cure.

Indexed as

Neoplasm MetastasisBreast NeoplasmsCalciumCation Transport ProteinsCaveolin 1FemaleHumansMAP Kinase Signaling SystemSodiumSodium-Hydrogen Exchanger 1Sodium-Hydrogen ExchangersVoltage-Gated Sodium ChannelsCalciumCation Transport ProteinsCaveolin 1SLC9A1 protein, humanSodiumSodium-Hydrogen Exchanger 1Sodium-Hydrogen ExchangersVoltage-Gated Sodium Channels

Identifiers

PMID22992466
PMCPMC3508774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.