ArticleAlgorithms for molecular biology : AMB2012
Parsimonious reconstruction of network evolution.
Article in Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparison between CARLIN and DNA Typewriter in CRISPR-mediated lineage tracing.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- PRIMED: predicting DNA binding residues by leveraging pre-trained protein language models.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Analysis of chromatin structure reveals the connection between sQTLs and the splicing of distant genes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Joint analysis of sQTL and Hi-C reveals spatial proximity between sQTLs and target genes in cancer tissues.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Maximum likelihood reconstruction of ancestral networks by integer linear programming.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Ancestral Reconstruction.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Bayesian inference for duplication-mutation with complementarity network models.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2015Article
- Predicting protein interactions via parsimonious network history inference.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2013Article
- The evolutionary dynamics of protein-protein interaction networks inferred from the reconstruction of ancient networks.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelled
backgroundUnderstanding the evolution of biological networks can provide insight into how their modular structure arises and how they are affected by environmental changes. One approach to studying the evolution of these networks is to reconstruct plausible common ancestors of present-day networks, allowing us to analyze how the topological properties change over time and to posit mechanisms that drive the networks' evolution. Further, putative ancestral networks can be used to help solve other difficult problems in computational biology, such as network alignment.
resultsWe introduce a combinatorial framework for encoding network histories, and we give a fast procedure that, given a set of gene duplication histories, in practice finds network histories with close to the minimum number of interaction gain or loss events to explain the observed present-day networks. In contrast to previous studies, our method does not require knowing the relative ordering of unrelated duplication events. Results on simulated histories and real biological networks both suggest that common ancestral networks can be accurately reconstructed using this parsimony approach. A software package implementing our method is available under the Apache 2.0 license at http://cbcb.umd.edu/kingsford-group/parana.
conclusionsOur parsimony-based approach to ancestral network reconstruction is both efficient and accurate. We show that considering a larger set of potential ancestral interactions by not assuming a relative ordering of unrelated duplication events can lead to improved ancestral network inference.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.