Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22992030›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2012

Steady-state voltammetry of a microelectrode in a closed bipolar cell.

Jonathan T Cox, Joshua P Guerrette, Bo Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Microscale and Nanoscale Electrophotonic Diagnostic Devices.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jonathan T CoxDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-1700, United States.
Joshua P Guerrette
Bo Zhang

Funding

New Electroanalytical Methods for Single-Cell ExocytosisR01GM101133 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ZHANG, BO · 2012 to 2016
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM101133NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we report the theory and experimental study of the steady-state voltammetric behavior of a microelectrode used as a limiting pole in a closed bipolar electrochemical cell. We show that the steady-state voltammetric response of a microelectrode used in a closed bipolar cell can be quantitatively understood by considering the responses of both poles in their respective conventional two-electrode setups. In comparison to a conventional electrochemical cell, the voltammetric response of the bipolar cell has a similar sigmoidal shape and limiting current; however, the response is often slower than that of the typical two-electrode setup. This leads to a broader voltammogram and a decreased wave slope, which can be somewhat misleading, causing the appearance that the process being studied is irreversible when it instead can be a result of the coupling of two reversible processes. We show that a large limiting current on the excess pole would facilitate the observation of a faster voltammetric response and that both redox concentration and electrode area of the excess pole affect the wave shape. Both factors should be maximized in electroanalytical experiments in order to obtain fast voltammetric responses on the main electrode of interest and to detect quick changes in analyte concentrations.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElectrochemical TechniquesEquipment DesignMicroelectrodesOxidation-Reduction

Identifiers

PMID22992030
PMCPMC3474901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.