Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22991015›Full record

Trial reportPeritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis

The effects of biocompatible compared with standard peritoneal dialysis solutions on peritonitis microbiology, treatment, and outcomes: the balANZ trial.

David W Johnson, Fiona G Brown, Margaret Clarke, Neil Boudville, Tony J Elias, Marjorie W Y Foo, Bernard Jones, Hemant Kulkarni, Robyn Langham, Dwarakanathan Ranganathan and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Biocompatible dialysis fluids for peritoneal dialysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Longitudinal Trend in Lipid Profile of Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Patients is Not Influenced by the Use of Biocompatible Solutions.Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
    Trial
  6. Utility of Urinary Biomarkers in Predicting Loss of Residual Renal Function: The balANZ Trial.Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Complement Activation in Peritoneal Dialysis-Induced Arteriolopathy.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2018
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Is there such a thing as biocompatible peritoneal dialysis fluid?Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2017
    Review
  15. ISPD Peritonitis Recommendations: 2016 Update on Prevention and Treatment.Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis · 2016
    Review
  16. Continuous Quality Improvement Initiatives to Sustainably Reduce Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Infections in Australia and New Zealand.Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. The impact of sub-clinical over-hydration on left ventricular mass in peritoneal dialysis patients.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Article
  19. Overcoming the Underutilisation of Peritoneal Dialysis.BioMed research international · 2015
    Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

David W JohnsonDepartment of Nephrology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. david_johnson@health.qld.gov.au
Fiona G Brown
Margaret Clarke
Neil Boudville
Tony J Elias
Marjorie W Y Foo
Bernard Jones
Hemant Kulkarni
Robyn Langham
Dwarakanathan Ranganathan
John Schollum
Michael G Suranyi
Seng H Tan
David Voss
balANZ Trial Investigators
Royal Adelaide Hospital · AUPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AUDunedin Public Hospital · NZFremantle Hospital · AUJohn Hunter Hospital · AULiverpool Hospital · AUMiddlemore Hospital · NZMount Elizabeth Hospital · SGSingapore General Hospital · SGThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA multicenter, multi-country randomized controlled trial (the balANZ study) recently reported that peritonitis rates significantly improved with the use of neutral-pH peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions low in glucose degradation products ("biocompatible") compared with standard solutions. The present paper reports a secondary outcome analysis of the balANZ trial with respect to peritonitis microbiology, treatment, and outcomes.

methodsAdult incident PD patients with residual renal function were randomized to receive either biocompatible or conventional (control) PD solutions for 2 years.

resultsThe safety population analysis for peritonitis included 91 patients in each group. The unadjusted geometric mean peritonitis rates in those groups were 0.30 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22 to 0.41] episodes per patient-year for the biocompatible group and 0.49 (95% CI: 0.39 to 0.62) episodes per patient-year for the control group [incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.61; 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.90; p = 0.01]. When specific causative organisms were examined, the rates of culture-negative, gram-positive, gram-negative, and polymicrobial peritonitis episodes were not significantly different between the biocompatible and control groups, although the biocompatible group did experience a significantly lower rate of non-pseudomonal gram-negative peritonitis (IRR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.92; p = 0.03). Initial empiric antibiotic regimens were comparable between the groups. Biocompatible fluid use did not significantly reduce the risk of peritonitis-associated hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.48 to 1.34), but did result in a shorter median duration of peritonitis-associated hospitalization (6 days vs 11 days, p = 0.05). Peritonitis severity was more likely to be rated as mild in the biocompatible group (37% vs 10%, p = 0.001). Overall peritonitis-associated technique failures and peritonitis-related deaths were comparable in the two groups.

conclusionsBiocompatible PD fluid use was associated with a broad reduction in gram-positive, gram-negative, and culture-negative peritonitis that reached statistical significance for non-pseudomonal gram-negative organisms. Peritonitis hospitalization duration was shorter, and peritonitis severity was more commonly rated as mild in patients receiving biocompatible PD fluids, although other peritonitis outcomes were comparable between the groups.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAustraliaBiocompatible MaterialsDialysis SolutionsFemaleHospitalizationHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationKidney Failure, ChronicMaleNew ZealandPeritoneal DialysisPeritoneumPeritonitisSurvival RateAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiocompatible MaterialsDialysis Solutions

Identifiers

PMID22991015
PMCPMC3524863
OpenAlexW2125839304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.