ArticleObesity surgery2013
A study examining the complications associated with gastric banding.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Technical Details and Result of a Minimally Invasive Management of Gastric Band Erosions: a Series of 47 Patients.Obesity surgery · 2019Article
- Simultaneous gastric and colonic erosions from gastric band and its tubing in the setting of recurrent intra-abdominal infection.Journal of surgical case reports · 2019Article
- Management of Slipped Gastric Bands via Creation of a De Novo Tunnel and Band Replacement: a Single-Centre Experience.Obesity surgery · 2018Article
- Gastric band tubing-related complication during pregnancy.Journal of surgical case reports · 2017Article
- Slippage-a Significant Problem Following Gastric Banding-a Single Centre Experience.Obesity surgery · 2017Article
- Migration of eroded laparoscopic adjustable gastric band causing small bowel obstruction and perforation.BMJ case reports · 2017Article
- Revisional bariatric surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding - a single-center, long-term retrospective study.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2017Article
- Management of a jejunal obstruction caused by the migration of a laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2017Article
- Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band Slippage Rates Following Laparoscopic Gastric Band Insertion: a Single Centre Experience.Obesity surgery · 2016Article
- Primordial Influence of Post-operative Compliance on Weight Loss After Adolescent Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding.Obesity surgery · 2016Article
- Safety of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding with concurrent cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis.Surgical endoscopy · 2015Article
- Gastric band port site fixation: which method is best?Journal of obesity · 2015Article
- [Redo intervention and complication management in bariatric surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2014Review
- Simultaneous Gastric and Duodenal Erosions due to Adjustable Gastric Banding for Morbid Obesity.Case reports in surgery · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastric banding is a well-recognized and common method of weight reduction surgery. Between November 2001 and September 2011, 1,100 laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding operations were performed in Sheffield. This study examines the long-term complication rate.
methodsAll available medical notes for patients undergoing gastric banding by one surgeon were reviewed. Data were available for 1,079 patients.
resultsA total of 932 females and 147 males underwent gastric banding. Mean weight was 120 kg, with body mass index of 43.3. Complications occurred in 347 patients (32.1 %). One hundred three (13.2 %) patients experienced band slippage; re-operation was required in half of these cases. Eighty-two patients had their band removed due to complications; there was slippage in 60, erosion in 17, and band intolerance in 5. One hundred thirty-six (12.6 %) patients experienced problems with their port or port tubing. Thirty-seven ports were flipped, noted during clinical or radiological fills (3.4 %), and 17 patients experienced port infection (1.5 %). Fifty ports required repositioning (4.6 %); 16 (1.4 %) were removed or replaced including five for cutaneous erosion. Eleven patients experienced tubing problems. Four patients required procedures to deal with intraoperative complications. Eighteen patients had a concurrent procedure. One postoperative death was due to biliary peritonitis in a patient who had undergone simultaneous cholecystectomy.
conclusionComplication rates reflect those in the literature. Slippage rate may appear higher in our patients, but this is a reflection of the fact that most patients undergo radiological band fills; hence, many non-symptomatic slippages are detected. Only half of our slippages (6.6 % of all patients) were clinically apparent or needed any intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.