ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2013
Immunogenicity of low-dose MF59-adjuvanted 2009 influenza A/H1N1 vaccine in dialysis patients.
Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunogenicity of trivalent influenza vaccines in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis: MF59-adjuvanted versus non-adjuvanted vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016Trial
- The nanoemulsion adjuvant provides antigen dose-sparing effects and enhances maternal passive immune protection for the cell-cultured quadrivalent influenza virus subunit vaccine.Virology journal · 2026Article
- Humoral response to BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in peritoneal and hemodialysis patients: A comparative study.Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn response to the pandemic 2009 A/H1N1 virus, monovalent MF59-adjuvanted vaccines were prepared. Recently, single 3.75-μg doses of MF59-adjuvanted vaccines have shown good immunogenicity in young adults. However, the immunogenicity of these vaccines has not been evaluated in dialysis patients.
methodsDialysis patients received a single 3.75-μg dose of MF59-adjuvanted vaccine by intramuscular injection. For immunogenicity assays, serum samples were obtained before vaccination and 28 days after vaccination. All sera were tested by hemagglutination inhibition assays.
resultsOverall, 48 hemodialysis (HD) patients and 34 peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients were included in immunogenicity analysis. In HD patients, geometric mean titers (GMTs) were significantly increased compared with baseline GMTs in both young (aged 18-60 years) and elderly (aged ≥ 60 years) patients (51.2 ± 51.4 vs. 14.1 ± 20.7 in young patients, P = 0.012; 37.9 ± 73.9 vs. 6.8 ± 8.0 in elderly patients, P = 0.018, respectively). The rates of seroprotection and seroconversion were 27.6 and 17.2 % in young patients and 31.6 and 26.3 % in elderly patients, respectively. Among PD patients, GMTs were increased only in young patients (39.8 ± 51.4 vs. 6.8 ± 5.0, P = 0.001). The rates of seroprotection and seroconversion were 36.0 and 36.0 % in young patients and 11.1 and 0.0 % in elderly patients, respectively.
conclusionA single 3.75-μg dose of MF59-adjuvanted vaccine was suboptimal to elicit protective antibody response in dialysis patients. Antibody responses against vaccine were compromised especially in elderly PD patients. Trials of different vaccination protocols such as a two-dose schedule or a higher hemagglutinin antigen dose of MF59-adjuvanted vaccine are necessary for improving antibody response in dialysis patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22990301What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.