Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22990138›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease2012

Impact of rapid drug susceptibility testing for tuberculosis: program experience in Lima, Peru.

S S Shin, L Asencios, M Yagui, G Yale, C Suárez, J Bayona, C Bonilla, O Jave, C C Contreras, S Atwood and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Clinical characteristics, drug resistance, and treatment outcomes among tuberculosis patients with diabetes in Peru.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2013
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

S S ShinDivision of Global Health Equity, and Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. sshin@partners.org
L Asencios
M Yagui
G Yale
C Suárez
J Bayona
C Bonilla
O Jave
C C Contreras
S Atwood
J A Blaya
J Ershova
J P Cegielski
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USHarvard University Press · USInstituto Nacional de Salud · PEMinistry of Health · PEBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDartmouth College · USEsSALUD · PE

Funding

Evaluation of MDR-TB Treatment Strategies in Lima, PeruK23AI054591 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SHIN, SONYA S · 2004 to 2006
$331k
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NIAID NIH HHS AI054591-01A2NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI054591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

settingProgrammatic implementation of decentralized rapid drug susceptibility testing (DST) in Lima, Peru.

objectivePre-post analysis compared time to diagnosis, treatment outcome and survival among patients tested with direct nitrate reductase assay (NRA) vs. indirect conventional methods.

designFrom 2005 to 2009, we prospectively followed all patients referred for DST before (control) and after (intervention) NRA implementation. Among those referred for DST, NRA was used for smear-positive samples of patients with no prior history of multidrug resistance or treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (TB). Data were abstracted from patient charts and laboratory registers. Endpoints were favorable outcomes, time to result and time to death.

resultsOf those patients who met the criteria for NRA, 740 underwent NRA and 621 underwent conventional DST. NRA yielded test results for 78.4% of cases vs. 68.8% for conventional DST (P < 0.0001); the median time to result was 44 vs. 133 days, respectively (adjusted HR 0.64, 95%CI 0.56-0.73). Among individuals without previous anti-tuberculosis treatment, NRA was associated with a favorable treatment outcome (adjusted OR 1.39, 95%CI 1.01-1.90) and prolonged survival (adjusted HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.31-0.90).

conclusionDirect NRA significantly shortened time to test result and improved treatment outcomes and survival in certain groups.

Indexed as

AdultAntitubercular AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedMycobacterium tuberculosisPeruProspective StudiesSputumSurvival RateTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeTuberculosisYoung AdultAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID22990138
PMCPMC5788451
OpenAlexW2014688912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.