Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22990034›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of clinical nutrition2012

Regional brain response to visual food cues is a marker of satiety that predicts food choice.

Sonya Mehta, Susan J Melhorn, Anne Smeraglio, Vidhi Tyagi, Thomas Grabowski, Michael W Schwartz, Ellen A Schur

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01631045 (The Effect of a Meal on Brain Activation in Reward Pathways), which is not on this map. Cited by 67 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01631045 completednot on this map

The Effect of a Meal on Brain Activation in Reward Pathways

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2010 to 2012Enrolled24ConditionsBrain Response to Visual Food Cues
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Food cue reactivity and craving predict eating and weight gain: a meta-analytic review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. [Influence of rs2587552 polymorphism ofBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2023
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. The critical role of gut-brain signalling in eating behaviour and obesity.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sonya MehtaDepartments of Radiology and the Diabetes and Obesity Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Susan J Melhorn
Anne Smeraglio
Vidhi Tyagi
Thomas Grabowski
Michael W Schwartz
Ellen A Schur

Funding

INSTITUTE FOR TRANSLATIONAL HEALTH SCIENCE (UL1): BPCAUL1RR025014 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2007 to 2011
$51.5M
Vector and Transgenic Mouse CoreP30DK017047 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Tomas Vaisar · 1986 to 2026
$41.4M
Institute for Translational Health Science (KL2)KL2RR025015 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2007 to 2011
$9.3M
Institute for Translational Health Science (TL1)TL1RR025016 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2007 to 2011
$2.7M
Institute of Translational Health SciencesTL1TR000422 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
Hypothalamic Inflammation and Energy HomeostasisR01DK090320 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SCHWARTZ, MICHAEL W · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000422NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR025015NCRR NIH HHS TL1 RR025016NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025014NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK017047NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK090320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeuronal processes that underlie the subjective experience of satiety after a meal are not well defined.

objectiveWe investigated how satiety alters the perception of and neural response to visual food cues.

designNormal-weight participants (10 men, 13 women) underwent 2 fMRI scans while viewing images of high-calorie food that was previously rated as incompatible with weight loss and "fattening" and low-calorie, "nonfattening" food. After a fasting fMRI scan, participants ate a standardized breakfast and underwent reimaging at a randomly assigned time 15-300 min after breakfast to vary the degree of satiety. Measures of subjective appetite, food appeal, and ad libitum food intake (measured after the second fMRI scan) were correlated with activation by "fattening" (compared with "nonfattening") food cues in a priori regions of interest.

resultsGreater hunger correlated with higher appeal ratings of "fattening" (r = 0.46, P = 0.03) but not "nonfattening" (r = -0.20, P = 0.37) foods. Fasting amygdalar activation was negatively associated with fullness (left: r = -0.52; right: r = -0.58; both P ≤ 0.01), whereas postbreakfast fullness was positively correlated with activation in the dorsal striatum (right: r = 0.44; left: r = 0.45; both P < 0.05). After breakfast, participants with greater activation in 4 regions-medial orbital frontal cortex (r = 0.49, P < 0.05), left amygdala (r = 0.49, P < 0.05), left insula (r = 0.47, P < 0.05), and nucleus accumbens (right: r = 0.57, P < 0.01; left: r = 0.43, P < 0.05)-chose buffet foods with higher fat content.

conclusionsPostmeal satiety is shown in regional brain activation by images of high-calorie foods. Regions including the amygdala, nucleus accumbens, and dorsal striatum may alter perception of, and reduce motivation to consume, energy-rich foods, ultimately driving food choice. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01631045.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrainChoice BehaviorEatingFemaleFoodHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRegression AnalysisSatiationVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID22990034
PMCPMC3471210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.