Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22988947›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2012

The waiting room: vector for health education? The general practitioner's point of view.

Maxine Gignon, Hadjila Idris, Cecile Manaouil, Oliver Ganry

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03239795 (Promoting Influenza Vaccination In General Practice Waiting Rooms By Posters And Pamphlets), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03239795 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Promoting Influenza Vaccination In General Practice Waiting Rooms By Posters And Pamphlets: A Registry Based Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChristophe BerkhoutRan2014 to 2017Enrolled10,597ConditionsHealth Behavior, Vaccination, Influenza, HumanArmsAdvertisement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Effectiveness of health education materials in general practice waiting rooms: a cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maxine GignonMedical School, Jules Verne University of Picardy, 3 rue des Louvels, F-80000, Amiens, France. maxime.gignon@u-picardie.fr
Hadjila Idris
Cecile Manaouil
Oliver Ganry

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral practitioners (GPs) play a central role in disseminating information and most health policies are tending to develop this pivotal role of GPs in dissemination of health-related information to the public. The objective of this study was to evaluate use of the waiting room by GPs as a vector for health promotion.

resultsA cross-sectional study was conducted on a representative sample of GPs using semi-structured, face-to-face interviews. A structured grid was used to describe the documents. Quantitative and qualitative analysis was performed. Sixty GPs participated in the study. They stated that a waiting room had to be pleasant, but agreed that it was a useful vector for providing health information. The GPs stated that they distributed documents designed to improve patient care by encouraging screening, providing health education information and addressing delicate subjects more easily. However, some physicians believed that this information can sometimes make patients more anxious. A large number of documents were often available, covering a variety of topics.

conclusionGeneral practitioners intentionally use their waiting rooms to disseminate a broad range of health-related information, but without developing a clearly defined strategy. It would be interesting to correlate the topics addressed by waiting room documents with prevention practices introduced during the visit.

Indexed as

AdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeneral PractitionersHealth EducationHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID22988947
PMCPMC3599884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.