Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22988124›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Transcriptional profiling in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy to identify candidate biomarkers.

Fedik Rahimov, Oliver D King, Doris G Leung, Genila M Bibat, Charles P Emerson, Louis M Kunkel, Kathryn R Wagner

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Fedik RahimovProgram in Genomics, Division of Genetics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Oliver D King
Doris G Leung
Genila M Bibat
Charles P Emerson
Louis M Kunkel
Kathryn R Wagner
Boston Biomedical Research Institute · USKennedy Krieger Institute · USDana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center · USHarvard University · USNeurology, Inc · US

Funding

SYNAPTIC MECHANISMS IN HIPPOCAMPAL EPILEPTOGENESISP30HD018655 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI POMEROY, SCOTT LOREN · 1985 to 2015
$26.2M
Myogenesis Studies for FSHD BiomarkersU54HD060848 · NICHD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI EMERSON, CHARLES P. · 2008 to 2017
$16.1M
Progenitor Cells inHuman Skeletal MuscleP50NS040828 · NINDS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI KUNKEL, LOUIS M · 2008 to 2011
$5.9M
NICHD NIH HHS 5U54HD060848NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD018655NICHD NIH HHS P30-HD-18655NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD060848NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS040828NINDS NIH HHS P50-NS-40828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a progressive neuromuscular disorder caused by contractions of repetitive elements within the macrosatellite D4Z4 on chromosome 4q35. The pathophysiology of FSHD is unknown and, as a result, there is currently no effective treatment available for this disease. To better understand the pathophysiology of FSHD and develop mRNA-based biomarkers of affected muscles, we compared global analysis of gene expression in two distinct muscles obtained from a large number of FSHD subjects and their unaffected first-degree relatives. Gene expression in two muscle types was analyzed using GeneChip Gene 1.0 ST arrays: biceps, which typically shows an early and severe disease involvement; and deltoid, which is relatively uninvolved. For both muscle types, the expression differences were mild: using relaxed cutoffs for differential expression (fold change ≥1.2; nominal P value <0.01), we identified 191 and 110 genes differentially expressed between affected and control samples of biceps and deltoid muscle tissues, respectively, with 29 genes in common. Controlling for a false-discovery rate of <0.25 reduced the number of differentially expressed genes in biceps to 188 and in deltoid to 7. Expression levels of 15 genes altered in this study were used as a "molecular signature" in a validation study of an additional 26 subjects and predicted them as FSHD or control with 90% accuracy based on biceps and 80% accuracy based on deltoids.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingBiomarkersHumansLogistic ModelsMuscle, SkeletalMuscular Dystrophy, FacioscapulohumeralOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerBiomarkersRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID22988124
PMCPMC3479603
OpenAlexW2039010203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.