Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22987680›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2012

Representation of three-dimensional objects by the rat perirhinal cortex.

S N Burke, A P Maurer, A L Hartzell, S Nematollahi, A Uprety, J L Wallace, C A Barnes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The impact of pitolisant, an HScientific reports · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Attenuated Activity across Multiple Cell Types and Reduced Monosynaptic Connectivity in the Aged Perirhinal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S N BurkeEvelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
A P Maurer
A L Hartzell
S Nematollahi
A Uprety
J L Wallace
C A Barnes

Funding

NEUROBEHAVIORAL RELATIONS IN SENESCENT HIPPOCAMPUSR01AG003376 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI BARNES, CAROL A. · 1985 to 2025
$16.4M
Cell Assemblies, Pattern Completion and the Aging BrainR37AG012609 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BARNES, CAROL A. · 2004 to 2013
$3.0M
Neurobehavioral Relations in Senescent HippocampusR56AG003376 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BARNES, CAROL A. · 2009 to 2009
$383k
Aging and Neural Ensembles in the Perirhinal CortexF31NS054465 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BURKE, SARA N · 2006 to 2008
$102k
NIA NIH HHS AG003376NIA NIH HHS R01 AG003376NIA NIH HHS R37 AG012609NIA NIH HHS R56 AG003376NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS054465NINDS NIH HHS NS054465PHS HHS HHMI5205889
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perirhinal cortex (PRC) is known to play an important role in object recognition. Little is known, however, regarding the activity of PRC neurons during the presentation of stimuli that are commonly used for recognition memory tasks in rodents, that is, three-dimensional objects. Rats in the present study were exposed to three-dimensional objects while they traversed a circular track for food reward. Under some behavioral conditions, the track contained novel objects, familiar objects, or no objects. Approximately 38% of PRC neurons demonstrated "object fields" (a selective increase in firing at the location of one or more objects). Although the rats spent more time exploring the objects when they were novel compared to familiar, indicating successful recognition memory, the proportion of object fields and the firing rates of PRC neurons were not affected by the rats' previous experience with the objects. Together, these data indicate that the activity of PRC cells is powerfully affected by the presence of objects while animals navigate through an environment; but under these conditions, the firing patterns are not altered by the relative novelty of objects during successful object recognition.

Indexed as

RewardAction PotentialsAnimalsBrain MappingCerebral CortexMaleRatsRats, Inbred F344Recognition, Psychology

Identifiers

PMID22987680
PMCPMC3447635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.