Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22987171›Full record

ArticleArchives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)2012

Lymph nodes and survival in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Geoffrey W Krampitz, Jeffrey A Norton, George A Poultsides, Brendan C Visser, Lixian Sun, Robert T Jensen

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Multiple endocrine neoplasia 1: a broad overview.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Geoffrey W KrampitzDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5655, USA.
Jeffrey A Norton
George A Poultsides
Brendan C Visser
Lixian Sun
Robert T Jensen

Funding

Diagnosis, Natural History, Management,tumor biology of Gastrinomas/PETs/Neuroendocrine tumorsZIADK053200 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI JENSEN, ROBERT · 2009 to 2025
$4.3M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 DA999999Intramural NIH HHS Z99 DK999999Intramural NIH HHS Z99 OD999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DK053200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

hypothesisLymph node metastases decrease survival in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs).

designProspective database searches.

settingNational Institutes of Health (NIH) and Stanford University Hospital (SUH). PATIENTS: A total of 326 patients underwent surgical exploration for pNETs at the NIH (n = 216) and SUH (n = 110).

main outcome measuresOverall survival, disease-related survival, and time to development of liver metastases.

resultsForty patients (12.3%) underwent enucleation and 305 (93.6%) underwent resection. Of the patients who underwent resection, 117 (35.9%) had partial pancreatectomy and 30 (9.2%) had a Whipple procedure. Forty-one patients also had liver resections, 21 had wedge resections, and 20 had lobectomies. Mean follow-up was 8.1 years (range, 0.3-28.6 years). The 10-year overall survival for patients with no metastases or lymph node metastases only was similar at 80%. As expected, patients with liver metastases had a significantly decreased 10-year survival of 30% (P < .001). The time to development of liver metastases was significantly reduced for patients with lymph node metastases alone compared with those with none (P < .001). For the NIH cohort with longer follow-up, disease-related survival was significantly different for those patients with no metastases, lymph node metastases alone, and liver metastases (P < .001). Extent of lymph node involvement in this subgroup showed that disease-related survival decreased as a function of the number of lymph nodes involved (P = .004).

conclusionsAs expected, liver metastases decrease survival of patients with pNETs. Patients with lymph node metastases alone have a shorter time to the development of liver metastases that is dependent on the number of lymph nodes involved. With sufficient long-term follow-up, lymph node metastases decrease disease-related survival. Careful evaluation of number and extent of lymph node involvement is warranted in all surgical procedures for pNETs.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsProspective StudiesSurvival RateYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID22987171
PMCPMC3448121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.