Trial reportJournal of addiction medicine2012
Safety of atomoxetine in combination with intravenous cocaine in cocaine-experienced participants.
Trial report in Journal of addiction medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00265265 (Phase 1, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multiple Dose Assessment of Potential Interactions Between Intravenous Cocaine and Atomoxetine), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase 1, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multiple Dose Assessment of Potential Interactions Between Intravenous Cocaine and Atomoxetine
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Atomoxetine in abstinent cocaine users: Cognitive, subjective and cardiovascular effects.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2017Trial
- Measurement of Impulsivity and Its Role in Drug Use Behaviours and Related Health, Harm and Treatment Outcomes Among People Who Use Illicit Drugs-A Scoping Review.International journal of mental health and addiction · 2026Article
- Pharmacological Treatments for Cocaine Craving: What Is the Way Forward? A Systematic Review.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- Machine Learning Analysis of Cocaine Addiction Informed by DAT, SERT, and NET-Based Interactome Networks.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2022Article
- Clinically Significant Drug-Drug Interactions with Agents for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.CNS drugs · 2019Review
- Atomoxetine in abstinent cocaine users: Sex differences.Data in brief · 2017Article
- Assessing the Value of the Zebrafish Conditioned Place Preference Model for Predicting Human Abuse Potential.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2017Article
- Single-trial lie detection using a combined fNIRS-polygraph system.Frontiers in psychology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAtomoxetine has been considered as an agonist replacement therapy for cocaine. We investigated the safety of the interaction of atomoxetine with cocaine and also whether cognitive function was affected by atomoxetine during short-term administration.
methodsIn a double-blind placebo-controlled inpatient study of 20 cocaine-dependent volunteers, participants received atomoxetine 80 mg daily followed by 100 mg daily for 5 days each. On the fourth and fifth day at each dose, cocaine (20 and 40 mg) was infused intravenously in sequential daily sessions.
resultsPreinfusion mean systolic pressures showed a small but statistically significant difference between placebo and both doses of atomoxetine. Preinfusion mean diastolic pressures were significant between placebo and atomoxetine 80 mg only. The diastolic pressure response to 40 mg cocaine was statistically significant only between the 80- and 100-mg atomoxetine doses. All electrocardiogram parameters were unchanged. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for "bad effect" in the atomoxetine group were significantly higher at baseline, then declined, and for "likely to use" declined with atomoxetine treatment. On the Addiction Research Center Inventory, the atomoxetine group scored significantly lower on amphetamine, euphoria, and energy subscales (P < 0.0001). Other VAS descriptors, Brief Substance Craving Scale, Profile of Moods State, and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale showed no differences. Atomoxetine did not affect cocaine pharmacokinetics. In tests of working memory, sustained attention, cognitive flexibility, and decision-making, atomoxetine improved performance on the visual n-back task. There were no differences in any pharmacokinetic parameters for cocaine with atomoxetine.
conclusionsAtomoxetine was tolerated safely by all participants. Certain cognitive improvements and a dampening effect on VAS scores after cocaine were observed, but should be weighed against small but significant differences in hemodynamic responses after atomoxetine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.