Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22987022›Full record

Trial reportJournal of addiction medicine2012

Safety of atomoxetine in combination with intravenous cocaine in cocaine-experienced participants.

Louis Cantilena, Roberta Kahn, Connie C Duncan, Shou-Hua Li, Ann Anderson, Ahmed Elkashef

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of addiction medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00265265 (Phase 1, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multiple Dose Assessment of Potential Interactions Between Intravenous Cocaine and Atomoxetine), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00265265 phase1completednot on this map

Phase 1, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multiple Dose Assessment of Potential Interactions Between Intravenous Cocaine and Atomoxetine

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Ran2005Enrolled16ConditionsCocaine-Related DisordersArmsAtomoxetine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Louis CantilenaDivision of Clinical Pharmacology and Medical Toxicology, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Roberta Kahn
Connie C Duncan
Shou-Hua Li
Ann Anderson
Ahmed Elkashef
Henry M. Jackson Foundation · USNational Institute on Drug Abuse · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 DA999999NIDA NIH HHS N01DA-05-8864NIDA NIH HHS N01DA-3-8829NIDA NIH HHS N01DA-7-8870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAtomoxetine has been considered as an agonist replacement therapy for cocaine. We investigated the safety of the interaction of atomoxetine with cocaine and also whether cognitive function was affected by atomoxetine during short-term administration.

methodsIn a double-blind placebo-controlled inpatient study of 20 cocaine-dependent volunteers, participants received atomoxetine 80 mg daily followed by 100 mg daily for 5 days each. On the fourth and fifth day at each dose, cocaine (20 and 40 mg) was infused intravenously in sequential daily sessions.

resultsPreinfusion mean systolic pressures showed a small but statistically significant difference between placebo and both doses of atomoxetine. Preinfusion mean diastolic pressures were significant between placebo and atomoxetine 80 mg only. The diastolic pressure response to 40 mg cocaine was statistically significant only between the 80- and 100-mg atomoxetine doses. All electrocardiogram parameters were unchanged. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for "bad effect" in the atomoxetine group were significantly higher at baseline, then declined, and for "likely to use" declined with atomoxetine treatment. On the Addiction Research Center Inventory, the atomoxetine group scored significantly lower on amphetamine, euphoria, and energy subscales (P < 0.0001). Other VAS descriptors, Brief Substance Craving Scale, Profile of Moods State, and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale showed no differences. Atomoxetine did not affect cocaine pharmacokinetics. In tests of working memory, sustained attention, cognitive flexibility, and decision-making, atomoxetine improved performance on the visual n-back task. There were no differences in any pharmacokinetic parameters for cocaine with atomoxetine.

conclusionsAtomoxetine was tolerated safely by all participants. Certain cognitive improvements and a dampening effect on VAS scores after cocaine were observed, but should be weighed against small but significant differences in hemodynamic responses after atomoxetine.

Indexed as

Adrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAdultAffectAtomoxetine HydrochlorideAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityBlood PressureCocaineCocaine-Related DisordersCognitionComorbidityDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleDrug InteractionsElectrocardiographyHeart RateAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAtomoxetine HydrochlorideCocainePropylamines

Identifiers

PMID22987022
PMCPMC3492533
OpenAlexW2075670867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.