ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2013
New anatomical data on the growing C4 vertebra and its three ossification centers in human fetuses.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- CT-Based Quantitative Analysis of Ossification Centres in the C7 Vertebra of Human Fetuses.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Digital Image Analysis of Vertebral Body S1 and Its Ossification Center in the Human Fetus.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Quantitative anatomy of the ilium's primary ossification center in the human fetus.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2018Article
- Digital image analysis of ossification centers in the axial dens and body in the human fetus.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2016Article
- Morphometric study of the neural ossification centers of the atlas and axis in the human fetus.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2016Article
- Morphometric study of the two fused primary ossification centers of the clavicle in the human fetus.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2016Article
- Three-dimensional growth dynamics of the liver in the human fetus.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2015Article
- Cross-sectional study of C1-S5 vertebral bodies in human fetuses.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2015Article
- Morphometric study of the T6 vertebra and its three ossification centers in the human fetus.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2013Article
- Cross-sectional study of the neural ossification centers of vertebrae C1-S5 in the human fetus.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2013Article
- Cross-sectional study of the ossification center of the C1-S5 vertebral bodies.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2013Article
- New patterns of the growing L3 vertebra and its 3 ossification centers in human fetuses - a CT, digital, and statistical study.Medical science monitor basic research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDetailed knowledge on the normative growth of the spine is of great relevance in the prenatal diagnosis of its abnormalities. The present study was conducted to compile age-specific reference data for vertebra C4 and its three ossification centers in human fetuses. MATERIALS AND
methodsWith the use of CT (Biograph mCT), digital image analysis (Osirix 3.9) and statistical analysis (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Levene's test, Student's t test, one-way ANOVA, post hoc RIR Tukey test, linear and nonlinear regression analysis), the normative growth of vertebra C4 and its three ossification centers in 55 spontaneously aborted human fetuses (27 males, 28 females) aged 17-30 weeks was examined.
resultsSignificant differences in neither sex nor laterality were found. The height and transverse and sagittal diameters of the C4 vertebral body increased logarithmically as: y = -3.866 + 2.225 × ln(Age) ± 0.238 (R(2) = 0.69), y = -7.077 + 3.547 × ln(Age) ± 0.356 (R(2) = 0.72) and y = -3.886 + 2.272 × ln(Age) ± 0.222 (R(2) = 0.73), respectively. The C4 vertebral body grew linearly in cross-sectional area as y = -7.205 + 0.812 × Age ± 1.668 (R(2) = 0.76) and four-degree polynomially in volume as y = 14.108 + 0.00007 × Age(4) ± 6.289 (R(2) = 0.83). The transverse and sagittal diameters, cross-sectional area and volume of the ossification center of the C4 vertebral body generated the following functions: y = -8.836 + 3.708 × ln(Age) ± 0.334 (R(2) = 0.76), y = -7.748 + 3.240 × ln(Age) ± 0.237 (R(2) = 0.83), y = -4.690 + 0.437 × Age ± 1.172 (R(2) = 0.63) and y = -5.917 + 0.582 × Age ± 1.157 (R(2) = 0.77), respectively. The ossification center-to-vertebral body volume ratio gradually declined with age. On the right and left, the neural ossification centers showed the following growth: y = -19.601 + 8.018 × ln(Age) ± 0.369 (R(2) = 0.92) and y = -15.804 + 6.912 × ln(Age) ± 0.471 (R (2) = 0.85) for length, y = -5.806 + 2.587 × ln(Age) ± 0.146 (R(2) = 0.88) and y = -5.621 + 2.519 × ln(Age) ± 0.146 (R(2) = 0.88) for width, y = -9.188 + 0.856 × Age ± 2.174 (R(2) = 0.67) and y = -7.570 + 0.768 × Age ± 2.200 (R(2) = 0.60) for cross-sectional area, and y = -13.802 + 1.222 × Age ± 1.872 (R(2) = 0.84) and y = -11.038 + 1.061 × Age ± 1.964 (R(2) = 0.80) for volume, respectively.
conclusionsThe morphometric parameters of vertebra C4 and its three ossification centers show no sex differences. The C4 vertebral body increases logarithmically in height and both sagittal and transverse diameters, linearly in cross-sectional area, and four-degree polynomially in volume. The three ossification centers of vertebra C4 grow logarithmically in both transverse and sagittal diameters, and linearly in both cross-sectional area and volume. The age-specific reference intervals for evolving vertebra C4 may be useful in the prenatal diagnosis of congenital spinal defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.