Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22986281›Full record

ReviewMolecular brain2012

Memory maintenance by PKMζ--an evolutionary perspective.

Todd Charlton Sacktor

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular brain, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. PKMζ Inhibition Disrupts Reconsolidation and Erases Object Recognition Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Todd Charlton SacktorThe Robert F. Furchgott Center for Neural and Behavioral Science, Department of Physiology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Ave, Brooklyn, NY 10705, USA. tsacktor@downstate.edu
State University of New York · US

Funding

PROTEIN KINASE C ISOZYMES IN HIPPOCAMPAL PLASTICITYR01MH053576 · NIMH · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI SACKTOR, TODD C · 2000 to 2014
$4.9M
Regulation and Neural Function of Atypical PKCR37MH057068 · NIMH · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI SACKTOR, TODD C · 2011 to 2020
$4.0M
CRCNS: PKMzeta-Dependent Protein Synthesis Maintains Synaptic PlasticityR01DA034970 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI SHOUVAL, HAREL ZEEV · 2012 to 2016
$1.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034970NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH053576NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH53576NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH057068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term memory is believed to be maintained by persistent modifications of synaptic transmission within the neural circuits that mediate behavior. Thus, long-term potentiation (LTP) is widely studied as a potential physiological basis for the persistent enhancement of synaptic strength that might sustain memory. Whereas the molecular mechanisms that initially induce LTP have been extensively characterized, the mechanisms that persistently maintain the potentiation have not. Recently, however, a candidate molecular mechanism linking the maintenance of LTP and the storage of long-term memory has been identified. The persistent activity of the autonomously active, atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) isoform, PKMζ, is both necessary and sufficient for maintaining LTP. Furthermore, blocking PKMζ activity by pharmacological or dominant negative inhibitors disrupts previously stored long-term memories in a variety of neural circuits, including spatial and trace memories in the hippocampus, aversive memories in the basolateral amygdala, appetitive memories in the nucleus accumbens, habit memory in the dorsal lateral striatum, and elementary associations, extinction, and skilled sensorimotor memories in the neocortex. During LTP and memory formation, PKMζ is synthesized de novo as a constitutively active kinase. This molecular mechanism for memory storage is evolutionarily conserved. PKMζ formation through new protein synthesis likely originated in early vertebrates ~500 million years ago during the Cambrian period. Other mechanisms for forming persistently active PKM from aPKC are found in invertebrates, and inhibiting this atypical PKM disrupts long-term memory in the invertebrate model systems Drosophila melanogaster and Aplysia californica. Conversely, overexpressing PKMζ enhances memory in flies and rodents. PKMζ persistently enhances synaptic strength by maintaining increased numbers of AMPA receptors at postsynaptic sites, a mechanism that might have evolved from the general function of aPKC in trafficking membrane proteins to the apical compartment of polarized cells. This mechanism of memory may have had adaptive advantages because it is both stable and reversible, as demonstrated by the downregulation of experience-dependent, long-term increases in PKMζ after extinction and reconsolidation blockade that attenuate learned behavior. Thus, PKMζ, the "working end" of LTP, is a component of an evolutionarily conserved molecular mechanism for the persistent, yet flexible storage of long-term memory.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsFeedback, PhysiologicalHumansLong-Term PotentiationMemoryProtein Kinase CSynapsesProtein Kinase C

Identifiers

PMID22986281
PMCPMC3517905
OpenAlexW2150090435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.