Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22985880›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2012

Efficacy of ceftaroline fosamil in a staphylococcal murine pneumonia model.

Amira A Bhalodi, Jared L Crandon, Donald Biek, David P Nicolau

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic review of ceftaroline fosamil in the management of patients with methicillin-resistantEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amira A BhalodiCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA.
Jared L Crandon
Donald Biek
David P Nicolau
Hartford Financial Services (United States)Hartford Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ceftaroline fosamil is a cephalosporin with activity against Gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The objective of this study was to characterize the dose-response relationship of ceftaroline fosamil against S. aureus in an immunocompromised murine pneumonia model, as well as to evaluate the efficacy of the humanized regimen of 600 mg intravenously (i.v.) every 12 h. Seventeen S. aureus (2 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus [MSSA], 15 MRSA) isolates with ceftaroline MICs of 0.5 to 4 μg/ml were utilized. The pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline in serum and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) were evaluated to determine bronchopulmonary exposure profiles in infected and uninfected animals, using single and human-simulated doses. Serum fT>MIC (the percentage of time that free drug concentrations remain above the MIC) of 17% to 43% was required to produce a 1-log(10) kill in the dose-ranging studies. These targets were readily achieved with the humanized exposure profile, where decreases of 0.64 to 1.95 log(10) CFU were observed against 13 MRSA and both MSSA isolates tested. When taken as a composite, the fT>MICs required for stasis and a 1-log(10) kill were 16% and 41%, respectively. ELF concentrations were similar to serum concentrations across the dosing interval in infected and uninfected animals. The serum fT>MIC targets required in this lung infection model were similar to those observed with ceftaroline against S. aureus in a murine thigh infection model. Exposures simulating the human dose of 600 mg i.v. every 12 h achieved pharmacodynamic targets against MRSA and MSSA considered susceptible by current U.S. FDA breakpoints.

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftarolineCephalosporinsColony Count, MicrobialDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansImmunocompromised HostLungMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNeutropeniaPneumonia, StaphylococcalAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftarolineCephalosporins

Identifiers

PMID22985880
PMCPMC3497181
OpenAlexW2071260810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.