ArticleBMC palliative care2012
After you: conversations between patients and healthcare professionals in planning for end of life care.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03332979 (Experiencing Loss and Planning Ahead Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 66 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Experiencing Loss and Planning Ahead Study (ELPAS): Caring for a Relative or Friend With Dementia
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 169 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experiences and perspectives of healthcare professionals implementing advance care planning for people suffering from life-limiting illness: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.BMC palliative care · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Factors associated with health professionals decision to initiate paediatric advance care planning: A systematic integrative review.Palliative medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Communication between healthcare professionals and relatives of patients approaching the end-of-life: A systematic review of qualitative evidence.Palliative medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Advance care planning: A systematic review about experiences of patients with a life-threatening or life-limiting illness.Palliative medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Experiences and Preferences for End-of-Life Care for Young Adults with Cancer and Their Informal Carers: A Narrative Synthesis.Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology · 2017Pooled it
- How to communicate with patients about future illness progression and end of life: a systematic review.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2014Pooled it
- Evaluation of a Novel Hospice-Specific Patient Decision Aid.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2024Trial
- Trial
- End-of-life planning with frail patients attending general practice: an exploratory prospective cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016Trial
- A mixed method feasibility study of a patient- and family-centred advance care planning intervention for cancer patients.BMC palliative care · 2015Trial
- Hope in Pediatric Palliative Care: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- What matters in end-of-life communication with nursing staff: an interview study among older people and their family caregivers.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- 'People ring because they're frightened': findings from a realist evaluation on the impact of timely responsive care at home at the end of life.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Impact of proactively inviting people with advanced cancer to talk about the end of life: a randomised clinical trial protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Talking about desire to die: Talking past each other? A framework analysis of interview triads with patients, informal caregivers, and health professionals.Palliative & supportive care · 2025Article
- Exploring the challenges experienced by patients and families using palliative and end-of-life care services: A qualitative focus group study.Palliative & supportive care · 2025Article
- Patient-Reported Worst-Case Scenarios in Advanced Cancer: Presence, Contents, and Predictors.Psycho-oncology · 2024Article
- "Starting to think that way from the start": approaching deprescribing decision-making for people accessing palliative care - a qualitative exploration of healthcare professionals views.BMC palliative care · 2024Article
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelled
backgroundThis study explores with patients, carers and health care professionals if, when and how Advance Care Planning conversations about patients' preferences for place of care (and death) were facilitated and documented.
methodsThe study adopted an exploratory case study design using qualitative interviews, across five services delivering palliative care to cancer and non-cancer patients within an urban and rural English region. The study recruited 18 cases made up of patients (N = 18; 10 men; 8 women; median age 75); nominated relatives (N = 11; 7 women; 4 men; median age 65) and healthcare professionals (N = 15) caring for the patient. Data collection included: 18 initial interviews (nine separate interviews with patients and 9 joint interviews with patients and relatives) and follow up interviews in 6 cases (involving a total of 5 patients and 5 relatives) within one year of the first interview. Five group interviews were conducted with 15 healthcare professionals; 8 of whom also participated in follow up interviews to review their involvement with patients in our study.
resultsPatients demonstrated varying degrees of reticence, evasion or reluctance to initiate any conversations about end of life care preferences. Most assumed that staff would initiate such conversations, while staff were often hesitant to do so. Staff-identified barriers included the perceived risks of taking away hope and issues of timing. Staff were often guided by cues from the patient or by intuition about when to initiate these discussions.
conclusionsThis study provides insights into the complexities surrounding the initiation of Advance Care Planning involving conversations about end of life care preferences with patients who are identified as having palliative care needs, in particular in relation to the risks inherent in the process of having conversations where mortality must be acknowledged. Future research is needed to examine how to develop interventions to help initiate conversations to develop person centred plans to manage the end of life.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.