Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22984447›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

The consequences of high cigarette excise taxes for low-income smokers.

Matthew C Farrelly, James M Nonnemaker, Kimberly A Watson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Cost Analysis of Motivational Interviewing and Preschool Education for Secondhand Smoke Exposures.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2016
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cigarette Prices and Disparities in Smoking Cessation in the United States.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Effect of cigarette prices on cigarette consumption in Ghana.Drug and alcohol dependence reports · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cigarette Prices and Smoking Behavior in Israel: Findings from a National Study of Adults (2002-2017).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  16. The causal impact of sugar taxes on soft drink sales: evidence from France and Hungary.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Stigma Experiences in People with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Integrative Review.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew C FarrellyResearch Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America. mcf@rti.org
James M Nonnemaker
Kimberly A Watson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo illustrate the burden of high cigarette excise taxes on low-income smokers. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsUsing data from the New York and national Adult Tobacco Surveys from 2010-2011, we estimated how smoking prevalence, daily cigarette consumption, and share of annual income spent on cigarettes vary by annual income (less than $30,000; $30,000-$59,999; and more than $60,000). The 2010-2011 sample includes 7,536 adults and 1,294 smokers from New York and 3,777 adults and 748 smokers nationally. Overall, smoking prevalence is lower in New York (16.1%) than nationally (22.2%) and is strongly associated with income in New York and nationally (P<.001). Smoking prevalence ranges from 12.2% to 33.7% nationally and from 10.1% to 24.3% from the highest to lowest income group. In 2010-2011, the lowest income group spent 23.6% of annual household income on cigarettes in New York (up from 11.6% in 2003-2004) and 14.2% nationally. Daily cigarette consumption is not related to income. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Although high cigarette taxes are an effective method for reducing cigarette smoking, they can impose a significant financial burden on low-income smokers.

Indexed as

IncomeAdultCommerceFamily CharacteristicsHumansNew YorkPrevalenceSelf ReportSmokingTaxesTobacco Products

Identifiers

PMID22984447
PMCPMC3440380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.