Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22984418›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Intracellular context affects levels of a chemically dependent destabilizing domain.

Mark A Sellmyer, Ling-chun Chen, Emily L Egeler, Rishi Rakhit, Thomas J Wandless

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Protocol forSTAR protocols · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Drug-Tunable Gene Therapy for Broad-Spectrum Protection against Retinal Degeneration.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The therapeutic application of CRISPR/Cas9 technologies for HIV.Expert opinion on biological therapy · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark A SellmyerDepartment of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Ling-chun Chen
Emily L Egeler
Rishi Rakhit
Thomas J Wandless
Stanford University · USConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ES

Funding

Novel Molecules as In Vivo Biological ProbesR01GM073046 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WANDLESS, THOMAS JAMES · 2006 to 2017
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM073046NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to regulate protein levels in live cells is crucial to understanding protein function. In the interest of advancing the tool set for protein perturbation, we developed a protein destabilizing domain (DD) that can confer its instability to a fused protein of interest. This destabilization and consequent degradation can be rescued in a reversible and dose-dependent manner with the addition of a small molecule that is specific for the DD, Shield-1. Proteins encounter different local protein quality control (QC) machinery when targeted to cellular compartments such as the mitochondrial matrix or endoplasmic reticulum (ER). These varied environments could have profound effects on the levels and regulation of the cytoplasmically derived DD. Here we show that DD fusions in the cytoplasm or nucleus can be efficiently degraded in mammalian cells; however, targeting fusions to the mitochondrial matrix or ER lumen leads to accumulation even in the absence of Shield-1. Additionally, we characterize the behavior of the DD with perturbants that modulate protein production, degradation, and local protein QC machinery. Chemical induction of the unfolded protein response in the ER results in decreased levels of an ER-targeted DD indicating the sensitivity of the DD to the degradation environment. These data reinforce that DD is an effective tool for protein perturbation, show that the local QC machinery affects levels of the DD, and suggest that the DD may be a useful probe for monitoring protein quality control machinery.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusDNA-Binding ProteinsEndoplasmic ReticulumHEK293 CellsHumansIntracellular SpaceMitochondriaProteinsProtein StabilityProtein Structure, TertiaryProtein TransportRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRegulatory Factor X Transcription FactorsRNA SplicingTranscription FactorsTunicamycinDNA-Binding ProteinsProteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRegulatory Factor X Transcription FactorsTranscription FactorsTunicamycin

Identifiers

PMID22984418
PMCPMC3440426
OpenAlexW2039301130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.