Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22984175›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Phylogenies reveal predictive power of traditional medicine in bioprospecting.

C Haris Saslis-Lagoudakis, Vincent Savolainen, Elizabeth M Williamson, Félix Forest, Steven J Wagstaff, Sushim R Baral, Mark F Watson, Colin A Pendry, Julie A Hawkins

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Ethnobotany-guided exploration of plant-derived photosensitizer candidates for photodynamic therapy.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. From Ethnobotany to Pharmacognosy: A Review ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Global phylogeny and taxonomy of Artemisia.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

C Haris Saslis-LagoudakisSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom. C.H.SaslisLagoudakis@gmail.com
Vincent Savolainen
Elizabeth M Williamson
Félix Forest
Steven J Wagstaff
Sushim R Baral
Mark F Watson
Colin A Pendry
Julie A Hawkins

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is controversy about whether traditional medicine can guide drug discovery, and investment in bioprospecting informed by ethnobotanical data has fluctuated. One view is that traditionally used medicinal plants are not necessarily efficacious and there are no robust methods for distinguishing those which are most likely to be bioactive when selecting species for further testing. Here, we reconstruct a genus-level molecular phylogenetic tree representing the 20,000 species found in the floras of three disparate biodiversity hotspots: Nepal, New Zealand, and the Cape of South Africa. Borrowing phylogenetic methods from community ecology, we reveal significant clustering of the 1,500 traditionally used species, and provide a direct measure of the relatedness of the three medicinal floras. We demonstrate shared phylogenetic patterns across the floras: related plants from these regions are used to treat medical conditions in the same therapeutic areas. This finding strongly indicates independent discovery of plant efficacy, an interpretation corroborated by the presence of a significantly greater proportion of known bioactive species in these plant groups than in random samples. We conclude that phylogenetic cross-cultural comparisons can focus screening efforts on a subset of traditionally used plants that are richer in bioactive compounds, and could revitalize the use of traditional knowledge in bioprospecting.

Indexed as

Medicine, African TraditionalMedicine, East Asian TraditionalPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNABase SequenceDNA, PlantHumansMolecular Sequence DataPhylogeographyPhytotherapyPlants, MedicinalDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID22984175
PMCPMC3465383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.