Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22983907›Full record

ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2012

Assessment of ventricular remodeling in heart failure clinical trials.

James N Kirkpatrick, Martin St John Sutton

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current heart failure reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James N KirkpatrickDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Martin St John Sutton
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adverse remodeling involves a complicated process of structural and functional changes in the left ventricle (LV). LV remodeling is progressive and, if left unchecked, culminates in heart failure that portends a poor prognosis. Clinical trials in heart failure have employed various techniques to assess ventricular remodeling while focusing on therapeutic-specific strategies to halt or reverse remodeling. These strategies include (1) those designed to reduce wall stress by limiting LV dilatation and reducing LV loading conditions (nitrates and epicardial restraint), (2) those designed to block neurohormonal activation, including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, β-adrenergic receptor blockers, and aldosterone receptor blockers, (3) ionotropic agents/cardiac glycosides, and (4) cardiac resynchronization therapy. Strategies in development include mechanical assist devices and myocardial regeneration. To date, trials have demonstrated a linkage between indices of remodeling and clinical outcomes measures. Indices of remodeling have facilitated identification of targets for novel pharmaceutical agents and new device therapies.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsCardiac Resynchronization TherapyCardiotonic AgentsClinical Trials as TopicHeart FailureHumansVasodilator AgentsVentricular RemodelingAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsCardiotonic AgentsVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID22983907
OpenAlexW2012171513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.