ReviewGlycoconjugate journal2013
Approaches to homozygosity mapping and exome sequencing for the identification of novel types of CDG.
Review in Glycoconjugate journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of a missense variant in COG5 in a Tunisian patient with COG5-CDG syndrome and insights into the effect of non-synonymous variants on COG5 protein.Journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- Mass spectrometry glycophenotype characterization of ALG2-CDG in Argentinean patients with a new genetic variant in homozygosis.Glycoconjugate journal · 2021Article
- Improved Diagnosis of Rare Disease Patients through Systematic Detection of Runs of Homozygosity.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2020Article
- Ten years of screening for congenital disorders of glycosylation in Argentina: case studies and pitfalls.Pediatric research · 2018Article
- An Unexplained Congenital Disorder of Glycosylation-II in a Child with Neurohepatic Involvement, Hypercholesterolemia and Hypoceruloplasminemia.JIMD reports · 2018Article
- Prospective phenotyping of NGLY1-CDDG, the first congenital disorder of deglycosylation.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2017Article
- What Have We Learned from Glycosyltransferase Knockouts in Mice?Journal of molecular biology · 2016Review
- Clinical diagnostics and therapy monitoring in the congenital disorders of glycosylation.Glycoconjugate journal · 2016Review
- Adult phenotype and further phenotypic variability in SRD5A3-CDG.BMC medical genetics · 2014Article
- Mutations in STT3A and STT3B cause two congenital disorders of glycosylation.Human molecular genetics · 2013Article
- Understanding human glycosylation disorders: biochemistry leads the charge.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2013Review
- MAN1B1 deficiency: an unexpected CDG-II.PLoS genetics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the past decade, the identification of most genes involved in Congenital Disorders of Glycosylation (CDG) (type I) was achieved by a combination of biochemical, cell biological and glycobiological investigations. This has been truly successful for CDG-I, because the candidate genes could be selected on the basis of the homology of the synthetic pathway of the dolichol linked oligosaccharide in human and yeast. On the contrary, only a few CDG-II defects were elucidated, be it that some of the discoveries represent wonderful breakthroughs, like e.g, the identification of the COG defects. In general, many rare genetic defects have been identified by positional cloning. However, only a few types of CDG have effectively been elucidated by linkage analysis and so-called reverse genetics. The reason is that the families were relatively small and could-except for CDG-PMM2-not be pooled for analysis. Hence, a large number of CDG cases has long remained unsolved because the search for the culprit gene was very laborious, due to the heterogeneous phenotype and the myriad of candidate defects. This has changed when homozygosity mapping came of age, because it could be applied to small (consanguineous) families. Many novel CDG genes have been discovered in this way. But the best has yet to come: what we are currently witnessing, is an explosion of novel CDG defects, thanks to exome sequencing: seven novel types were published over a period of only two years. It is expected that exome sequencing will soon become a diagnostic tool, that will continuously uncover new facets of this fascinating group of diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.