Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22983687›Full record

ArticleSurgery today2013

Use of the LigaSure device and the Stapler for closure of the small bowel: a comparative ex vivo study.

Mario Santini, Alfonso Fiorelli, Gaetana Messina, Paolo Laperuta, Antonio Mazzella, Marina Accardo

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery today, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. AnFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Ultrasound location of ground-glass opacity during thoracoscopic surgery.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tissue fusion technology versus suture and staple in porcine bowel anastomosis: an in vivo study.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Surgical approach in thymectomy: Our experience and review of the literature.International journal of surgery case reports · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mario SantiniThoracic Surgery Unit, Second University of Naples, Piazza Miraglia 2, Naples, 80138, Italy. mario.santini@unina2.it
Alfonso Fiorelli
Gaetana Messina
Paolo Laperuta
Antonio Mazzella
Marina Accardo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the LigaSure device in closing divisions of the small bowel in an ex vivo porcine model.

methodsTwo types of closure were performed: stumps created by "muco-mucosa" fusion and stumps created by "sero-serosa" fusion. For each type of closure, different power levels of the LigaSure system were tested in combination with different numbers of applications and then compared with the Stapler group.

resultsWith both types of intestinal closure, the highest value of burst pressure was obtained with the application of a power level of three bars and one frequency application. The high burst pressure of the muco-mucosa stump group was significantly lower than that of the Stapler group (41.8 ± 5.9 vs. 75.8 ± 5.9, respectively, p < 0.01). No differences were found between the high burst pressure of the sero-serosa stump group and the Stapler group (74.1 ± 5.5 vs. 75.8 ± 5.9, respectively, p = 0.2).

conclusionsOur preliminary results showed that the LigaSure is an efficient tool for closing the intestines when sero-serosa stumps are created. The second step of our work will be to evaluate the feasibility of this tool in creating intestinal anastomoses.

Indexed as

Surgical StaplersAnastomosis, SurgicalAnimalsDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFeasibility StudiesIntestine, SmallModels, AnimalSurgical StaplingSuture TechniquesSwine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.